Jakobsen K D, Frederiksen J N, Parnas J, Werge T
Research Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Sct Hans Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Psychopathology. 2006;39(6):269-76. doi: 10.1159/000095731. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
To investigate whether diagnostic agreement across different diagnostic systems improves in a sample of chronic patients suffering from functional psychosis compared to first-admitted patients.
Among 353 patients with a history of functional psychosis, a subset of 100 individuals (35 women and 65 men) were randomly sampled and assessed using the Operational Criteria Checklist for Psychotic Illness and Affective Illness (OPCRIT). Based on the OPCRIT diagnoses the subjects suffering from schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders according to seven diagnostic systems were identified. Diagnostic agreement was assessed using unweighted kappa-statistics and pairwise concordance rates (CR).
High diagnostic agreement of schizophrenia was observed across the ICD-10 and DSM systems (CR >0.70, kappa >0.70), which all had a significantly lower concordance to the St. Louis Criteria (SLC), research diagnostic criteria and Schneider's first rank symptoms (FRS) (0.32< CR <0.66; -0.10< kappa <0.51). Agreement on schizophrenia across all systems was observed for one fourth of the subjects. Elimination of the diagnostic impact of 'co-occurrence of psychotic and affective symptoms' excluded FRS standalone individuals from the sample, increased overall homogeneity and resulted in a dichotomized sample according to SLC (46 positive vs. 47 negative). SLC status could be predicted in 78% of cases by four items relating to family history and psychosocial function previous to the onset of illness. Similarly high pairwise CR were observed for schizophrenia spectrum disorders across all diagnostic systems.
This study demonstrates that diagnostic agreement is higher among chronic patients than that observed in subjects with a recent onset of psychosis, although considerable discordance is also observed in this chronic sample. However, the discordance among chronic patients with functional psychosis largely derives from the different emphasis that diagnostic systems place on co-occurrence of psychotic and affective symptoms. This may have serious epistemological consequences, thus underlining the conventional nature of the present schizophrenia diagnoses and the need for biologically founded diagnostic criteria.
研究与首次入院患者相比,慢性功能性精神病患者样本中不同诊断系统之间的诊断一致性是否有所提高。
在353例有功能性精神病病史的患者中,随机抽取100例个体(35名女性和65名男性),使用精神病性疾病和情感性疾病操作标准检查表(OPCRIT)进行评估。根据OPCRIT诊断,确定了按照七种诊断系统患有精神分裂症和精神分裂症谱系障碍的受试者。使用未加权kappa统计量和成对一致性率(CR)评估诊断一致性。
在国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)系统中观察到精神分裂症的诊断一致性较高(CR>0.70,kappa>0.70),而这两种系统与圣路易斯标准(SLC)、研究诊断标准和施奈德一级症状(FRS)的一致性均显著较低(0.32 < CR < 0.66; - 0.10 < kappa < 0.51)。四分之一的受试者在所有系统中对精神分裂症的诊断一致。消除“精神病性和情感性症状共现”的诊断影响,将仅符合FRS的个体排除在样本之外,提高了总体同质性,并根据SLC得到了一个二分样本(46例阳性对47例阴性)。通过与发病前家族史和心理社会功能相关的四个项目,78%的病例可以预测SLC状态。在所有诊断系统中,精神分裂症谱系障碍的成对CR也同样较高。
本研究表明,慢性患者之间的诊断一致性高于近期发病的受试者,但在这个慢性样本中也观察到了相当大的不一致性。然而,慢性功能性精神病患者之间的不一致性很大程度上源于诊断系统对精神病性和情感性症状共现的不同强调。这可能会产生严重的认识论后果,从而凸显了当前精神分裂症诊断的传统性质以及基于生物学的诊断标准的必要性。