Eggly Susan, Penner Louis A, Greene Meredith, Harper Felicity W K, Ruckdeschel John C, Albrecht Terrance L
Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(11):2974-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
Previous research has investigated patient question asking in clinical settings as a strategy of information seeking and as an indicator of the level of active patient participation in the interaction. This study investigates questions asked by patients and their companions during stressful encounters in the oncology setting in the USA. We transcribed all questions patients and companions asked the oncologist during 28 outpatient interactions in which "bad news" was discussed (n = 705) and analyzed them for frequency and topic. Additionally, we analyzed the extent to which personal and demographic characteristics and independently obtained ratings of the oncologist-patient/companion relationships were related to question asking. Findings demonstrated that at least one companion was present in 24 (86%) of the 28 interactions and companions asked significantly more questions than patients. The most frequently occurring topics for both patients and companions were treatment, diagnostic testing, diagnosis, and prognosis. In general, personal and demographic characteristics were unrelated to question asking, but older patients asked fewer questions, while more educated patients asked more questions. With regard to ratings of the quality of the dyadic relationships, results showed that "trust" between the physician and companions was positively correlated and "conversational dominance by physician" was negatively correlated with the frequency of companion questions. Additionally, positive ratings of the relationship between physicians and companions were correlated with fewer patient questions. This study demonstrates that companions are active participants in stressful oncology interactions. Future research and physician training in communication would benefit from expanding the focus beyond the patient-physician dyad to the roles and influence of multiple participants in medical interactions.
以往的研究将临床环境中患者提问作为一种信息寻求策略,以及患者在互动中积极参与程度的一个指标来进行调查。本研究调查了美国肿瘤治疗环境中患者及其同伴在压力情境下提出的问题。我们转录了患者和同伴在28次门诊互动中向肿瘤医生提出的所有问题(其中讨论了“坏消息”,n = 705),并对这些问题的频率和主题进行了分析。此外,我们分析了个人和人口统计学特征以及独立获得的肿瘤医生与患者/同伴关系评分与提问之间的关联程度。研究结果表明,在28次互动中有24次(86%)至少有一名同伴在场,同伴提出的问题明显多于患者。患者和同伴最常提及的主题是治疗、诊断测试、诊断和预后。总体而言,个人和人口统计学特征与提问无关,但年龄较大的患者提问较少,而受教育程度较高的患者提问较多。关于二元关系质量的评分,结果显示医生与同伴之间的“信任”呈正相关,而“医生的对话主导地位”与同伴提问的频率呈负相关。此外,医生与同伴关系的积极评分与患者提问较少相关。本研究表明,同伴是肿瘤压力互动中的积极参与者。未来关于沟通的研究和医生培训将受益于将关注点从医患二元关系扩展到医疗互动中多个参与者的角色和影响。