Villalba Anabel, Valdez Silvina N, Iacono Rubén F, Poskus Edgardo
School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina.
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Feb;376(1-2):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Jul 22.
Antibodies to GAD65 (GADA) are considered highly predictive humoral markers of the type 1 diabetes mellitus and also of the insulin requirement in adult-onset patients presumptively classified as type 2 diabetics or LADA.
We present 2 methods for GADA assessment. The first one (fluid phase, ELISA Protocol A) is carried out in a 2-step procedure in which serum GADA are first allowed to react with a fixed dose of GAD65-biotin in solution and the residual free antigen is later assayed by a conventional ELISA. In the second test (solid phase, ELISA Protocol B) GADA are measured in an ELISA that depends on the ability of divalent autoantibodies to form a bridge between immobilized TrxGAD65 and liquid-phase biotinylated TrxGAD65.
All normal control samples scored negative in both variants of ELISA and RBA, hence specificity was 100% for all methods; the relative sensitivity of ELISA Protocol A respect of the RBA was 94% and that of ELISA Protocol B was 76%.
Although ELISA Protocol A exhibited a better performance in terms of relative sensitivity than ELISA Protocol B, the simplicity of execution and the intended use of the assay must also be taken in consideration for the final choice.
谷氨酸脱羧酶65抗体(GADA)被认为是1型糖尿病高度预测性的体液标志物,也是成年起病患者胰岛素需求的标志物,这些患者被初步归类为2型糖尿病或成人隐匿性自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA)。
我们介绍了两种评估GADA的方法。第一种方法(液相,ELISA方案A)分两步进行,首先让血清GADA与固定剂量的生物素化GAD65在溶液中反应,然后通过传统ELISA检测残留的游离抗原。在第二种检测方法(固相,ELISA方案B)中,通过一种ELISA检测GADA,该方法依赖于二价自身抗体在固定化TrxGAD65和液相生物素化TrxGAD65之间形成桥联的能力。
所有正常对照样本在ELISA和放射配体结合分析(RBA)的两种变体中均呈阴性,因此所有方法的特异性均为100%;ELISA方案A相对于RBA的相对灵敏度为94%,ELISA方案B的相对灵敏度为76%。
尽管ELISA方案A在相对灵敏度方面比ELISA方案B表现更好,但在最终选择时还必须考虑检测方法的操作简便性和预期用途。