• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2002年加利福尼亚州计划生育豁免计划避免的怀孕估计数。

Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002.

作者信息

Foster Diana Greene, Biggs M Antonia, Amaral Gorette, Brindis Claire, Navarro Sandy, Bradsberry Mary, Stewart Felicia

机构信息

Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Sep;38(3):126-31. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.126.06.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.38.126.06
PMID:16963385
Abstract

CONTEXT

During its first year of operation (1997-1998), California's family planning program, Family PACT, helped more than 750,000 clients to avert an estimated 108,000 pregnancies. Given subsequent increases in the numbers of clients served and contraceptive methods offered by the program, updated estimates of its impact on fertility are needed.

METHODS

Claims data on contraceptives dispensed were used to estimate the number of pregnancies experienced by women in the program in 2002. Medical record data on methods used prior to enrollment were used to predict client fertility in the absence of the program. Further analyses examined the sensitivity of these estimates to alternative assumptions about contraceptive failure rates, contraceptive continuation and contraceptive use in the absence of program services.

RESULTS

Almost 6.4 million woman-months of contraception, provided primarily by oral contraceptives (57%), barrier methods (19%) and the injectable (18%), were dispensed through Family PACT during 2002. As a result, an estimated 205,000 pregnancies-which would have resulted in 79,000 abortions and 94,000 births, including 21,400 births to adolescents-were averted. Changing the base assumptions regarding contraceptive failure rates or method use had relatively small effects on the estimates, whereas assuming that clients would use no contraceptives in the absence of Family PACT nearly tripled the estimate of pregnancies averted.

CONCLUSION

Because all contraceptive methods substantially reduce the risk of pregnancy, Family PACT's impact on preventing pregnancy lies primarily in providing contraceptives to women who would otherwise not use any method.

摘要

背景

在其运营的第一年(1997 - 1998年),加利福尼亚州的计划生育项目“家庭生育计划”(Family PACT)帮助超过75万名客户避免了约10.8万次意外怀孕。鉴于该项目后续服务客户数量和提供的避孕方法有所增加,需要对其对生育率影响的估计进行更新。

方法

使用所发放避孕药具的申领数据来估计2002年该项目中女性经历的怀孕数量。利用登记前使用避孕方法的医疗记录数据来预测在没有该项目情况下客户的生育情况。进一步分析检验了这些估计对避孕失败率、避孕持续时间以及在没有项目服务时避孕使用情况等替代假设的敏感性。

结果

2002年通过“家庭生育计划”发放了近640万妇女 - 月的避孕措施,主要包括口服避孕药(57%)、屏障法(19%)和注射剂(18%)。结果,估计避免了20.5万次意外怀孕,这些意外怀孕原本会导致7.9万次堕胎和9.4万次生育,其中包括2.14万次青少年生育。改变关于避孕失败率或方法使用的基础假设对估计结果影响相对较小,而假设在没有“家庭生育计划”的情况下客户不使用任何避孕措施,会使避免怀孕的估计数几乎增加两倍。

结论

由于所有避孕方法都能大幅降低怀孕风险,“家庭生育计划”对预防怀孕的影响主要在于为那些否则不会使用任何避孕方法的女性提供避孕药具。

相似文献

1
Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002.2002年加利福尼亚州计划生育豁免计划避免的怀孕估计数。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Sep;38(3):126-31. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.126.06.
2
Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California.估计加利福尼亚州扩大公共资助计划生育服务的生育效果。
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
3
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
4
Pregnancies averted among U.S. teenagers by the use of contraceptives.美国青少年使用避孕药具避免怀孕的情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jan-Feb;31(1):29-34.
5
The impact of family planning clinic programs on adolescent pregnancy.计划生育门诊项目对青少年怀孕的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1981 May-Jun;13(3):109-16.
6
Contraceptive development and better family planning.避孕药具的研发与更好的计划生育。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1996 Summer;73(1):92-104.
7
The impact of public-sector expenditures for contraceptive services in California.加利福尼亚州公共部门在避孕服务方面的支出影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):161-8.
8
Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009.2009 年特定避孕方法提供方面的成本节约。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jul-Aug;23(4):e265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.05.004.
9
Contraception to prevent HIV-positive births: current contribution and potential cost savings in PEPFAR countries.预防艾滋病毒阳性产妇分娩的避孕措施:对美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)国家的当前贡献及潜在成本节约
Sex Transm Infect. 2008 Oct;84 Suppl 2:ii49-53. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.030049.
10
Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998.扩大由政府资助的计划生育服务:估算1997 - 1998年加利福尼亚州家庭援助与咨询治疗项目(Family PACT Program)避免的怀孕数量
Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1341-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1341.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.《平价医疗法案》扩大避孕覆盖范围可节省公共资金。
Contraception. 2013 Feb;87(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
2
Limited socioeconomic opportunities and Latina teen childbearing: a qualitative study of family and structural factors affecting future expectations.经济社会机会有限与拉丁裔少女生育:影响未来期望的家庭和结构因素的定性研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2013 Apr;15(2):334-40. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9653-z.
3
Population policies, programmes and the environment.
人口政策、方案与环境。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 27;364(1532):3049-65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0162.
4
Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.在一项公共资助项目中,通过提供特定避孕方法实现的成本节约。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):446-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129353. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
5
Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California.预防意外怀孕带来的公共储蓄:加利福尼亚州计划生育服务的成本分析。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1960-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00702.x.