Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚水稻种植中广灭灵、禾草敌和杀草丹的田间消散及环境危害评估

Field dissipation and environmental hazard assessment of clomazone, molinate, and thiobencarb in Australian rice culture.

作者信息

Quayle Wendy C, Oliver Danielle P, Zrna Sharyn

机构信息

CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 3, Griffith, NSW, 2680 Australia.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Sep 20;54(19):7213-20. doi: 10.1021/jf061107u.

Abstract

The fates of clomazone [2-(2-chlorophenyl)methyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone], molinate (S-ethyl hexahydro-1-H-azepine-1-carbothioate), and thiobencarb {S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]diethylcarbamothioate} applied to rice were studied at two locations in New South Wales (Australia). Rates of dissipation (DT50) from floodwaters and soils were measured. Dissipation of the three herbicides from water and soil can be best explained by a first-order decay process. DT(50) values for clomazone, molinate, and thiobencarb were 7.2, 5.1, and 3.5 days, respectively, in water and 14.6, 23.9, and >46 days, respectively, in surface soil. Maximum measured concentrations of clomazone, molinate, and thiobencarb in floodwaters were 202, 1042, and 148 microg/L, respectively, taking 18.4, 26.4, and 21.4 days to dissipate to concentrations set to protect aquatic ecosystems. A hazard assessment identified clomazone as presenting a low environmental hazard while molinate and thiobencarb presented a medium environmental hazard when used at registered field rates.

摘要

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的两个地点,研究了稗草畏[2-(2-氯苯基)甲基-4,4-二甲基-3-异恶唑烷酮]、禾草敌(S-乙基六氢-1H-氮杂卓-1-硫代羧酸酯)和杀草丹{S-[(4-氯苯基)甲基]二乙基硫代氨基甲酸酯}施用于水稻田后的情况。测定了它们在稻田水和土壤中的消散速率(DT50)。这三种除草剂在水和土壤中的消散情况可用一级衰减过程来最好地解释。稗草畏、禾草敌和杀草丹在水中的DT(50)值分别为7.2天、5.1天和3.5天,在表层土壤中的DT(50)值分别为14.6天、23.9天和>46天。稻田水中稗草畏、禾草敌和杀草丹的最大测定浓度分别为20μg/L、1042μg/L和148μg/L,分别需要18.4天、26.4天和21.4天消散至设定的保护水生生态系统的浓度。一项危害评估表明,按照登记的田间施用量使用时,稗草畏对环境危害较低,而禾草敌和杀草丹对环境危害中等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验