Johnson D Thor, Harris Robert A, Blair Paul V, Balaban Robert S
Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Rm. B1D416, Bethesda, MD 20892-1061, USA.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007 Feb;292(2):C698-707. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00109.2006. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
Potential functional consequences of the differences in protein distribution between the mitochondria of the rat liver, heart, brain, and kidney, as determined in the companion paper in this issue (Johnson DT, French S, Blair PV, You JS, Bemis KG, Wang M, Harris RA, and Balaban RS. The tissue heterogeneity of the mammalian mitochondrial proteome. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol292: C689-C697, 2006), were analyzed using a canonical metabolic pathway approach as well as a functional domain homology analysis. These data were inserted into the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway framework to give global and metabolic pathway-specific information on the impact of the differential protein distribution on mitochondrial function. Custom pathway analysis was also performed using pathways limited to the mitochondrion. With the use of this approach, several well-known functional differences between these mitochondrial populations were confirmed. These included GABA metabolism in the brain, urea synthesis in the liver, and the domination of oxidative phosphorylation in the heart. By comparing relative protein amounts of mitochondria across tissues, a greater understanding of functional emphasis is possible as well as the nuclear "programming" required to enhance a given function within the mitochondria. For proteins determined to be mitochondrial and lacking a defined role functional domain BLAST analyses were performed. Several proteins associated with DNA structural modification and a novel CoA transferase were identified. A protein was also identified capable of catalyzing the first three steps of de novo pyrimidine synthesis. This analysis demonstrates that the distribution of nuclear encoded proteins significantly modifies the overall functional emphasis of the mitochondria to meet tissue-specific needs. These studies demonstrate the existence of mitochondrial biochemical functions that at present are poorly defined.
在本期的配套论文(Johnson DT, French S, Blair PV, You JS, Bemis KG, Wang M, Harris RA, and Balaban RS. The tissue heterogeneity of the mammalian mitochondrial proteome. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C689-C697, 2006)中确定了大鼠肝脏、心脏、大脑和肾脏线粒体之间蛋白质分布的差异,利用典型代谢途径方法以及功能域同源性分析对其潜在的功能后果进行了分析。这些数据被插入到京都基因与基因组百科全书途径框架中,以提供关于差异蛋白质分布对线粒体功能影响的全局和代谢途径特异性信息。还使用仅限于线粒体的途径进行了定制途径分析。通过这种方法,证实了这些线粒体群体之间的几个众所周知的功能差异。这些差异包括大脑中的GABA代谢、肝脏中的尿素合成以及心脏中氧化磷酸化的主导地位。通过比较不同组织中线粒体的相对蛋白量,不仅可以更深入地了解功能重点,还能了解增强线粒体中特定功能所需的核“编程”。对于确定为线粒体且缺乏明确作用功能域的蛋白质,进行了BLAST分析。鉴定出了几种与DNA结构修饰相关的蛋白质和一种新型辅酶A转移酶。还鉴定出一种能够催化从头嘧啶合成前三步的蛋白质。该分析表明,核编码蛋白质的分布显著改变了线粒体的整体功能重点,以满足组织特异性需求。这些研究证明了目前定义不明确的线粒体生化功能的存在。