Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中的临终关怀——对濒死患者的照料还是“拔管”?

End of life in ICU--care of the dying or 'pulling the plug'?

作者信息

Collins N, Phelan D, Carton E

机构信息

Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, Mater Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin.

出版信息

Ir Med J. 2006 Apr;99(4):112-4.

Abstract

This study, a modified subsection of the European ETHICUS study on End-of-Life (EOL) Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), examines the pattern of limiting futile life-sustaining therapies in an Irish ICU including the practice of withdrawing mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death. 1146 patients were admitted to the Mater Hospital, Dublin ICU from 1/9/1999 to 30/6/2000 and all 126 patients who died in ICU were included. EOL categories were prospectively defined (by Ethicus methodology) as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); brain death; withholding (WH); withdrawing (WD) life sustaining therapy and active shortening of the dying process (SDP). Complete data were obtained for 122 of the 126 patients who died during this period. 45 patients (36%) had therapy withheld, 40 (33%) had therapy withdrawn, 26 (21%) had unsuccessful CPR and 11 (10%) were Brain Dead. SDP was not performed. In total, 85 patients had a limitation of life sustaining therapy. CPR was the main therapy withheld (96% of WH/WD patients). Inotropic infusions were limited (WH or WD) in 40/85 (47%) of patients. Fluids, feeding and oxygen were rarely withdrawn (2.4%, 6%, 4.8% respectively). Twenty-two patients had two or more EOL decisions. Tracheal extubation or withdrawal of ventilation was less frequent (16.4%) but more common if a second EOL decision was made. No patient had sedation withdrawn or decreased. Eight patients of 85 (9%) had sedation increased. The study demonstrates that EOL decision making is common (69% of deaths and 7.4% of ICU admissions) in Ireland and demonstrates that the pattern of treatment limitation relates primarily to cardiovascular and other treatments and less to respiratory life sustaining treatment. Artificial nutrition and hydration were rarely withdrawn.

摘要

本研究是欧洲伦理研究中关于重症监护病房(ICU)临终(EOL)决策制定部分的修改版,考察了爱尔兰一家ICU中限制无效生命维持治疗的模式,包括在预期死亡时撤掉机械通气的做法。1999年9月1日至2000年6月30日期间,1146名患者入住都柏林圣母医院ICU,其中所有在ICU死亡的126名患者均被纳入研究。临终类别(采用伦理研究方法)被前瞻性地定义为心肺复苏(CPR);脑死亡; withholding(WH); withdrawing(WD)生命维持治疗以及主动缩短死亡过程(SDP)。在此期间死亡的126名患者中,有122名患者获得了完整数据。45名患者(36%)接受了治疗 withhold,40名(33%)接受了治疗 withdraw,26名(21%)心肺复苏未成功,11名(10%)为脑死亡。未进行SDP。总共有85名患者的生命维持治疗受到限制。CPR是主要被 withhold 的治疗(96%的WH/WD患者)。40/85(47%)的患者限制了血管活性药物输注(WH或WD)。很少撤掉液体、喂养和氧气(分别为2.4%、6%、4.8%)。22名患者有两项或更多临终决策。气管插管拔除或通气撤掉的情况较少(16.4%),但如果做出第二项临终决策则更为常见。没有患者撤掉或减少镇静。85名患者中有8名(9%)增加了镇静。该研究表明,在爱尔兰,临终决策很常见(占死亡人数的69%和ICU入院人数的7.4%),并且表明治疗限制模式主要与心血管及其他治疗有关,而与呼吸生命维持治疗关系较小。很少撤掉人工营养和补液。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验