Suppr超能文献

地区文化对重症监护临终决策的影响:来自ETHICUS研究的以色列视角

The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study.

作者信息

Ganz F D, Benbenishty J, Hersch M, Fischer A, Gurman G, Sprung C L

机构信息

Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Nursing, Kiryat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):196-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012542.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decisions of patients, families, and health care providers about medical care at the end of life depend on many factors, including the societal culture. A pan-European study was conducted to determine the frequency and types of end of life practices in European intensive care units (ICUs), including those in Israel. Several results of the Israeli subsample were different to those of the overall sample.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article was to explore these differences and provide a possible explanation based on the impact of culture on end of life decision making.

METHOD

All adult patients admitted consecutively to three Israeli ICUs (n = 2778) who died or underwent any limitation of life saving interventions between 1 January 1999 and 30 June 2000 were studied prospectively (n = 363). These patients were compared with a similar sample taken from the larger study (ethics in European intensive care units: ETHICUS) carried out in 37 European ICUs. Patients were followed until discharge, death, or 2 months from the decision to limit therapy. End of life decisions were prospectively organised into one of five mutually exclusive categories: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), brain death, withholding treatment, withdrawing treatment, and active shortening of the dying process (SDP). The data also included patient characteristics (gender, age, ICU admission diagnosis, chronic disorders, date of hospital admission, date and time of decision to limit therapy, date of hospital discharge, date and time of death in hospital), specific therapies limited, and the method of SDP.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (n = 252, 69%) had treatment withheld, none underwent SDP, 62 received CPR (17%), 31 had brain death (9%), and 18 underwent withdrawal of treatment (5%). The primary reason given for limiting treatment was that the patient was unresponsive to therapy (n = 187). End of life discussions were held with 132 families (36%), the vast majority of which revolved around withholding treatment (91% of the discussions) and the remainder concerned withdrawing treatment (n = 11, 9%). There was a statistically significant association (chi2 = 830.93, df = 12, p < 0.0001) between the type of end of life decision and region-that is, the northern region of Europe, the central region, the southern region, and Israel.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional culture plays an important part in end of life decision making. Differences relating to end of life decision making exist between regions and these differences can often be attributed to cultural factors. Such cultures not only affect patients and their families but also the health care workers who make and carry out such decisions.

摘要

背景

患者、家属及医护人员关于临终医疗的决策取决于诸多因素,包括社会文化。开展了一项泛欧洲研究,以确定欧洲重症监护病房(ICU)(包括以色列的ICU)临终医疗行为的频率及类型。以色列子样本的若干结果与总体样本不同。

目的

本文旨在探究这些差异,并基于文化对临终决策的影响给出可能的解释。

方法

对1999年1月1日至2000年6月30日期间连续入住以色列三家ICU且死亡或接受任何生命支持干预限制的所有成年患者(n = 2778)进行前瞻性研究(n = 363)。将这些患者与从在37家欧洲ICU开展的规模更大的研究(欧洲重症监护病房伦理:ETHICUS)中选取的类似样本进行比较。对患者进行随访,直至出院、死亡或自决定限制治疗起2个月。临终决策被前瞻性地分为五个相互排斥的类别之一:心肺复苏(CPR)、脑死亡、 withhold治疗、 withdraw治疗以及积极缩短死亡过程(SDP)。数据还包括患者特征(性别、年龄、ICU入院诊断、慢性疾病、入院日期、决定限制治疗的日期和时间、出院日期、在医院死亡的日期和时间)、受限的具体治疗以及SDP的方式。

结果

大多数患者(n = 252,69%)接受了 withhold治疗,无人接受SDP,62人接受了CPR(17%),31人被判定脑死亡(9%),18人接受了withdraw治疗(5%)。限制治疗的主要原因是患者对治疗无反应(n = 187)。与132个家庭(36%)进行了临终讨论,其中绝大多数围绕withhold治疗(讨论的91%),其余涉及withdraw治疗(n = 11,9%)。临终决策类型与地区(即欧洲北部地区、中部地区、南部地区和以色列)之间存在统计学显著关联(卡方 = 830.93,自由度 = 12,p < 0.0001)。

结论

地区文化在临终决策中起重要作用。不同地区在临终决策方面存在差异,且这些差异通常可归因于文化因素。此类文化不仅影响患者及其家属,还影响做出并执行此类决策的医护人员。 (注:原文中withhold和withdraw在医学语境下可能有特定含义,这里直接保留英文未准确翻译其医学意义,仅按字面翻译,可能影响对内容的准确理解。)

相似文献

4
End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study.
JAMA. 2003 Aug 13;290(6):790-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.6.790.
5
Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study.
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0927-1. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
7
The impact of religion on changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units: a comparative analysis over 16 years.
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Nov;49(11):1339-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07228-z. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
8
End-of-life practices in Hong Kong intensive care units: results from the Ethicus-2 study.
Hong Kong Med J. 2024 Aug;30(4):300-309. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2310944. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
10
End-of-life decisions in Greek intensive care units: a multicenter cohort study.
Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R228. doi: 10.1186/cc9380. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A closer look at regional differences in euthanasia practices in the Netherlands.
Res Health Serv Reg. 2025 Jul 23;4(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s43999-025-00069-x.
2
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Brazilian medical television shows: a descriptive and quality assessment study.
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 16;37:e20250228. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250228. eCollection 2025.
3
Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest managed with and without a specialized code team: A retrospective observational study.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0309376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309376. eCollection 2024.
6
Impact of major illnesses and geographic regions on do-not-resuscitate rate and its potential cost savings in Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222320. eCollection 2019.
9
Making good death more accessible: end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Aug;42(8):1258-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4396-2. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1572-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Timers on ventilators.
BMJ. 2005 Feb 19;330(7488):415-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.415.
2
Evaluation of changes in forgoing life-sustaining treatment in Israeli ICU patients.
Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1969-73. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1969.
4
End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study.
JAMA. 2003 Aug 13;290(6):790-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.6.790.
6
A cross-cultural comparison of critical care delivery: Japan and the United States.
Chest. 2002 Feb;121(2):539-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.2.539.
7
Historical and philosophical reflections on patient autonomy.
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(3):299-319. doi: 10.1023/A:1012901831835.
8
Cultural competence for critical care nursing practice.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;13(4):521-30.
9
10
Cultural differences in end-of-life care.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2 Suppl):N52-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102001-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验