Scholtanus Johannes D, Huysmans Marie-Charlotte D N J M
Department of Conservative Dentistry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Dent. 2007 Feb;35(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) class-II restorations over 6 years of clinical service.
All class-II GIC restorations made in 1996 and 1997, in regular attending adult patients of a general dental practice were selected. Restorations made for temporary function were excluded, as were those restorations not made using the main study material: Fuji IX GP (GC). Failures were recorded where replacement or repair had occurred. Radiographs were evaluated where available.
The final study group consisted of 116 class-II restorations in 72 patients (33 males, 39 females). Distribution of restorations was: 30 MO, 40 DO, 46 MOD. Until 18 months no failures were observed. From 18 to 42 months survival dropped to 93%. After 42 months failure rate increased and at 72 months survival was only 60%. In all but one case the recorded reason for replacement or repair was gross loss of GIC in proximal areas. No restorations failed because of occlusal wear or isthmus-fractures. On radiographs, progressive loss of GIC material in proximal areas, just below contact areas, was commonly observed. In absence of adjacent teeth no loss of GIC material was observed at proximal surfaces.
Rising failure rate of class-II high-viscosity GIC restorations, due to proximal breakdown was observed. We hypothesize that caries-like loss of material as seen on radiographs contributes to this phenomenon. Presence of proximal contacts seems to promote disintegration of cement.
这项回顾性临床研究的目的是评估高粘度玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)II类修复体在6年临床使用中的性能。
选取1996年和1997年在一家普通牙科诊所定期就诊的成年患者中制作的所有II类GIC修复体。排除用于临时功能的修复体,以及未使用主要研究材料富士IX GP(GC)制作的修复体。记录发生更换或修复的失败情况。如有可用的X线片,则进行评估。
最终研究组包括72例患者(33例男性,39例女性)的116个II类修复体。修复体分布为:30个近中邻合面(MO),40个远中邻合面(DO),46个近中邻远中邻合面(MOD)。在18个月前未观察到失败情况。18至42个月时生存率降至93%。42个月后失败率增加,72个月时生存率仅为60%。除1例病例外,记录的更换或修复原因均为近端区域GIC大量损失。没有修复体因咬合磨损或峡部骨折而失败。在X线片上,通常观察到在接触区域下方的近端区域GIC材料逐渐损失。在没有相邻牙齿的情况下,近端表面未观察到GIC材料损失。
观察到II类高粘度GIC修复体由于近端破坏导致失败率上升。我们假设X线片上所见的类似龋齿的材料损失是导致这一现象的原因。近端接触的存在似乎促进了水门汀的崩解。