• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Use of vascular risk-modifying medications for diabetic patients differs between physician specialties.

作者信息

Shah B R, Hux J E, Laupacis A, Zinman B, Booth G L

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2006 Oct;23(10):1117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01955.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01955.x
PMID:16978377
Abstract

AIMS

Although heart disease and stroke are the underlying causes of death in most people with diabetes, vascular risk modification targets are frequently not met. This study examined whether vascular risk-modifying medication utilization for diabetic patients differed among physician specialties.

METHODS

A population-based study using administrative data from 105 715 people aged >/= 65 years with newly diagnosed diabetes in Ontario between 1994 and 2001. The receipt of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs was compared between patients who had regular care from endocrinologists, internists/geriatricians and family physicians. Hierarchical logistic regression adjusted for patient-level differences, physician-level differences and patient clustering within physicians.

RESULTS

Only two-thirds of patients received antihypertensive drugs and about one-quarter received lipid-lowering drugs. Compared with patients of family physicians, the adjusted odds ratios for antihypertensive drug use were 1.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 1.38] for patients of internists/geriatricians and 1.03 (95% CI 0.94, 1.12) for patients of endocrinologists. For lipid-lowering drugs, the odds ratios were 1.20 (95% CI 1.11, 1.30) for patients of internists/geriatricians and 1.58 (95% CI 1.42, 1.76) for patients of endocrinologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations to use vascular risk-modifying medication for most older people with diabetes, many patients were not receiving these medications. Medication utilization differed between physician specialties, with family physicians having the lowest rates of use. Notably, although blood pressure control has the greatest evidence of benefit and is cost-saving, endocrinologists did not use antihypertensive drugs more often than family physicians after adjustment for other differences.

摘要

相似文献

1
Use of vascular risk-modifying medications for diabetic patients differs between physician specialties.
Diabet Med. 2006 Oct;23(10):1117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01955.x.
2
Risk modification for diabetic patients. Are other risk factors treated as diligently as glycemia?糖尿病患者的风险修正。其他风险因素的治疗是否像血糖一样勤勉?
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Fall;11(2):e239-44. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
3
Care and outcomes of patients newly hospitalized for heart failure in the community treated by cardiologists compared with other specialists.与其他专科医生相比,心脏病专家治疗的社区中新住院心力衰竭患者的护理及治疗结果。
Circulation. 2003 Jul 15;108(2):184-91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080290.39027.48. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
4
For the majority of patients with diabetes blood pressure and lipid management is not in line with recommendations. Results from a large population-based cohort in Germany.对于大多数糖尿病患者来说,血压和血脂管理不符合建议。来自德国一项基于大量人群的队列研究结果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 May;17(5):485-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.1589.
5
Factors associated with the use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with myocardial infarction.老年心肌梗死患者出院后使用循证治疗的相关因素。
CMAJ. 2008 Oct 21;179(9):901-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080295.
6
Increase in lipid-lowering treatment rates among TRICARE beneficiaries: a population-based study.TRICARE受益人群中降脂治疗率的提高:一项基于人群的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Oct;18(10):891-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1786.
7
Cardiovascular medications in primary care: treatment gaps and targeting by absolute risk.基层医疗中的心血管药物:治疗差距与绝对风险靶向治疗
N Z Med J. 2005 Oct 7;118(1223):U1676.
8
Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care.医生性别与2型糖尿病护理质量相关。
J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):340-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01967.x. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
9
Blood pressure control and physicians' therapeutic behavior in a very elderly Spanish hypertensive population.西班牙高龄高血压人群的血压控制与医生的治疗行为
Hypertens Res. 2009 Sep;32(9):753-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.102. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
10
Risk factor control in patients with Type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease: findings from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR).2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者的危险因素控制:来自瑞典国家糖尿病登记处(NDR)的研究结果
Diabet Med. 2009 Jan;26(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02633.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The paradox of primary care.初级保健的悖论。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;7(4):293-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1023.
2
Overall quality of diabetes care in a defined geographic region: different sides of the same story.特定地理区域内糖尿病护理的整体质量:同一情况的不同方面。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May;58(550):339-45. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X280209.