Wiley Jenny L, Razdan Raj K, Martin Billy R
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 23298-0613, USA.
Life Sci. 2006 Dec 3;80(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.08.017. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
The pharmacological profiles of the endocannabinoid anandamide and exogenous cannabinoids (e.g., Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol) are similar, but not exactly the same. One notable difference is that anandamide's in vivo effects in mice are not blocked by the brain cannabinoid (CB1) receptor antagonist SR141716A. The degree to which the rapid metabolism of anandamide to arachidonic acid might be involved in this unexpected lack of effect was the focus of this study. Mice were tested in a tetrad of tests sensitive to cannabinoids, consisting of spontaneous locomotion, ring immobility, rectal temperature and tail flick nociception. Anandamide and arachidonic acid produced a similar profile of effects, but neither drug was blocked by SR141716A. When hydrolysis of anandamide was inhibited by an amidase inhibitor (phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride; PMSF), however, SR141716A significantly attenuated anandamide's effects but did not completely block them. Similarly, the effects of the metabolically stable anandamide analog O-1812 were attenuated by SR141716A. The role of oxidative metabolism in anandamide's effects in the tetrad was also investigated through pharmacological modulation of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase, two major classes of enzymes that degrade arachidonic acid. Whereas the non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor ibuprofen blocked the in vivo effects of arachidonic acid, it did not alter anandamide's effects. Other modulators of the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways also failed to block anandamide's effects. Together, these results offer partial support for a pharmacokinetic explanation of the failure of SR141716A to antagonize the effects of anandamide; however, they also suggest that non-CB1, non-CB2 receptors may be involved in mediation of anandamide's in vivo actions, particularly at higher doses.
内源性大麻素花生四烯乙醇胺和外源性大麻素(如Δ9-四氢大麻酚)的药理特性相似,但并不完全相同。一个显著的差异是,花生四烯乙醇胺在小鼠体内的作用不会被脑大麻素(CB1)受体拮抗剂SR141716A阻断。花生四烯乙醇胺快速代谢为花生四烯酸的过程在多大程度上可能与这种意外的无效性有关,是本研究的重点。在一组对大麻素敏感的四项测试中对小鼠进行了检测,这四项测试包括自发运动、环形静止、直肠温度和甩尾痛觉感受。花生四烯乙醇胺和花生四烯酸产生了相似的效应谱,但这两种药物均未被SR141716A阻断。然而,当花生四烯乙醇胺的水解被酰胺酶抑制剂(苯甲基磺酰氟;PMSF)抑制时,SR141716A显著减弱了花生四烯乙醇胺的作用,但并未完全阻断。同样,代谢稳定的花生四烯乙醇胺类似物O-1812的作用也被SR141716A减弱。还通过对环氧化酶和脂氧合酶(降解花生四烯酸的两大类酶)进行药理学调节,研究了氧化代谢在花生四烯乙醇胺在这四项测试中的作用。虽然非选择性环氧化酶抑制剂布洛芬阻断了花生四烯酸的体内作用,但它并未改变花生四烯乙醇胺的作用。环氧化酶和脂氧合酶途径的其他调节剂也未能阻断花生四烯乙醇胺的作用。总之,这些结果为SR141716A未能拮抗花生四烯乙醇胺作用的药代动力学解释提供了部分支持;然而,它们也表明非CB1、非CB2受体可能参与介导花生四烯乙醇胺的体内作用,尤其是在较高剂量时。