• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电话医学跨学科焦点小组:一项质量改进举措。

Inter-disciplinary focus groups on telephone medicine: a quality improvement initiative.

作者信息

Whitson Heather E, Hastings S Nicole, McConnell Eleanor S, Lekan-Rutledge Deborah A

机构信息

Geriatrics Division, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3003, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Sep;7(7):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.01.023. Epub 2006 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.01.023
PMID:16979082
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify opportunities for quality improvement in long-term care telephone medicine using a model of interdisciplinary focus groups.

DESIGN

Descriptive pilot project.

SETTING

Extended Care and Rehabilitation Center (ECRC), Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight of 20 registered or licensed practical nurses and 4 of 6 geriatric medicine fellows voluntarily participated in this quality improvement project.

MEASUREMENTS

In two 45-minute focus groups, participants were asked to discuss 3 open-ended questions related to telephone medicine. Comments were recorded during the discussions; topical themes were identified by the authors.

RESULTS

Participant comments could be categorized into 4 domains describing the characteristics of nurses and physicians who practice the best telephone medicine: (1) provides the appropriate medical component of patient care; (2) appreciates contextual issues; (3) respects the other party's time and resources; and (4) possesses a collaborative attitude. The focus groups identified 5 quality improvement goals: (1) better nursing assessment and provision of patient information; (2) minimization of non-urgent calls after hours; (3) more decisive physician action (or explanation of inaction); (4) better physician familiarity with facility policies/logistics; and (5) better communication/paging system. The discussion format allowed nurses and physicians to identify and respond to potential barriers to improving quality in each area.

CONCLUSION

Nurses and physicians appreciate unique aspects of long-term care telephone medicine and identify distinct barriers to improving practice. Interdisciplinary focus groups were a productive step toward understanding the telephone medicine experience in our facility and developing quality improvement interventions for both nurses and physicians.

摘要

目的

采用跨学科焦点小组模型确定长期护理电话医疗质量改进的机会。

设计

描述性试点项目。

地点

北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市达勒姆退伍军人医疗中心的延伸护理与康复中心(ECRC)。

参与者

20名注册护士或执业护士中的8名以及6名老年医学研究员中的4名自愿参与了这个质量改进项目。

测量方法

在两个45分钟的焦点小组中,参与者被要求讨论与电话医疗相关的3个开放式问题。讨论过程中记录评论;作者确定主题。

结果

参与者的评论可分为4个领域,描述了提供最佳电话医疗服务的护士和医生的特征:(1)提供患者护理的适当医疗部分;(2)理解背景问题;(3)尊重对方的时间和资源;(4)具备协作态度。焦点小组确定了5个质量改进目标:(1)更好地进行护理评估并提供患者信息;(2)尽量减少非紧急时段的电话;(3)医生采取更果断的行动(或解释不采取行动的原因);(4)医生更好地熟悉机构政策/后勤;(5)改善通信/传呼系统。讨论形式使护士和医生能够识别并应对每个领域提高质量的潜在障碍。

结论

护士和医生认识到长期护理电话医疗的独特方面,并确定了改善实践的明显障碍。跨学科焦点小组是朝着了解我们机构的电话医疗体验以及为护士和医生制定质量改进干预措施迈出的富有成效的一步。

相似文献

1
Inter-disciplinary focus groups on telephone medicine: a quality improvement initiative.电话医学跨学科焦点小组:一项质量改进举措。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Sep;7(7):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.01.023. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
2
A quality improvement program to enhance after-hours telephone communication between nurses and physicians in a long-term care facility.一项旨在改善长期护理机构中护士与医生之间非工作时间电话沟通的质量改进计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1080-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01714.x. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
3
Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record.跨学科合作与电子病历。
Pediatr Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;34(3):225-7, 240.
4
From the emergency department to home.从急诊科到家中。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):776-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01129.x.
5
Quality improvement initiative for chronic pain assessment and management in the nursing home: a pilot study.养老院慢性疼痛评估与管理的质量改进举措:一项试点研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 May;7(4):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
6
Development and implementation of the TrAC (Tracking After-hours Calls) database: a tool to collect longitudinal data on after-hours telephone calls in long-term care.TrAC(非工作时间电话跟踪)数据库的开发与实施:一种收集长期护理中非工作时间电话纵向数据的工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Mar;8(3):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.11.003.
7
Quality geriatric care as perceived by nurses in long-term and acute care settings.长期护理和急性护理环境中护士对老年护理质量的认知。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Mar;21(5-6):833-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03781.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
8
Quality of communication during telephone triage at Dutch out-of-hours centres.荷兰非工作时间医疗中心电话分诊时的沟通质量。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
9
Improving networks between acute care nurses and an aged care assessment team.改善急症护理护士与老年护理评估团队之间的协作网络。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 May;13(4):486-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00863.x.
10
After-hours calls from long-term care facilities in a geriatric medicine training program.老年医学培训项目中来自长期护理机构的非工作时间来电。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec;55(12):1989-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01472.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Health information technologies in geriatrics and gerontology: a mixed systematic review.老年医学和老年学中的健康信息技术:混合系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001705. Epub 2013 May 10.
2
Provider management of and satisfaction with laboratory testing in the nursing home setting: results of a national internet-based survey.疗养院环境中实验室检测的提供者管理与满意度:一项基于互联网的全国性调查结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Mar;10(3):161-166.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.08.018. Epub 2009 Jan 8.