Park Kevin B, Dalton-Brown Emma, Hirst Charlotte, Williams Dominic P
Drug Safety Research Group, Department Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton St., L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2006 Nov 7;549(1-3):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.08.025. Epub 2006 Aug 26.
Adverse drug reactions, such as hepatotoxicity, blood dyscrasias and hypersensitivity are a major obstacle for the use and the development of new medicines. Many forms of organ-directed toxicity can arise from the bioactivation of drugs to so-called chemically reactive metabolites, which can modify tissue macromolecules. It is well established that the toxicities of model hepatotoxins, such as acetaminophen, furosemide, bromobenzene and methapyrilene can be correlated with the generation of chemically reactive metabolites, which can be detected by measurement of the irreversible binding of radiolabelled material to hepatic protein and/or the detection of stable phase II metabolites such as glutathione conjugates. The basic chemistry of the reaction of such metabolites with model nucleophiles is relatively well understood. A major challenge is to define how certain reactive intermediates may chemically modify critical proteins and how modification of specific amino acids may alter protein function which in turn may affect cell signalling, regulation, defence, function and viability. This in turn will determine whether or not bioactivation will result in a particular form of drug-induced injury. It is now clear that even relatively simple reactive intermediates can react in a discriminative manner with particular cellular proteins and even with specific amino acids within those proteins. Therefore both non-covalent, as well as covalent bonds will be important determinants of the target protein for a particular reactive metabolite. Mammalian cells have evolved numerous defence systems against reactive intermediates. Sensitive redox proteins such as Nrf-2 recognize oxidative stress and electrophilic agents. This is achieved by chemical modification of cysteine groups within keap-1, which normally forms an inactive heterodimer with Nrf-2. Modification of keap-1 releases Nrf-2 that translocates to the nucleus and effects gene transcription of a number of genes involved in the detoxication of chemically reactive metabolites. Diminution of protein function can occur by either covalent modification of nucleophilic amino acids (e.g. cysteine, lysine, histidine etc.) or oxidation of thiols, which can be reversible or irreversible. In the case of acetaminophen, more than 30 target proteins have been identified and for several of them, corresponding alterations in protein function have been defined in the context of tissue necrosis. Alternatively, protein modification may induce signalling systems which initiate cell death, an immune response or to an altered tissue genotype.
药物不良反应,如肝毒性、血液系统异常和超敏反应,是新药使用和研发的主要障碍。许多形式的器官定向毒性可源于药物生物活化生成所谓的化学反应性代谢物,这些代谢物可修饰组织大分子。众所周知,对乙酰氨基酚、呋塞米、溴苯和甲吡咯等典型肝毒素的毒性与化学反应性代谢物的生成相关,化学反应性代谢物可通过测量放射性标记物质与肝蛋白的不可逆结合和/或检测稳定的Ⅱ相代谢物(如谷胱甘肽结合物)来检测。这类代谢物与典型亲核试剂反应的基础化学已得到较好理解。一个主要挑战是确定某些反应性中间体如何化学修饰关键蛋白,以及特定氨基酸的修饰如何改变蛋白功能,进而影响细胞信号传导、调节、防御、功能和活力。这反过来又将决定生物活化是否会导致特定形式的药物性损伤。现在很清楚,即使是相对简单的反应性中间体也能以有区别的方式与特定细胞蛋白甚至这些蛋白内的特定氨基酸发生反应。因此,非共价键以及共价键对于特定反应性代谢物的靶蛋白来说都是重要的决定因素。哺乳动物细胞已进化出多种针对反应性中间体的防御系统。诸如Nrf-2等敏感的氧化还原蛋白可识别氧化应激和亲电试剂。这是通过对keap-1内的半胱氨酸基团进行化学修饰来实现的,keap-1通常与Nrf-2形成无活性的异二聚体。keap-1的修饰会释放Nrf-2,Nrf-2会转移至细胞核并影响许多参与化学反应性代谢物解毒的基因的转录。蛋白功能的减弱可通过亲核氨基酸(如半胱氨酸、赖氨酸、组氨酸等)的共价修饰或硫醇的氧化发生,这可以是可逆的或不可逆的。就对乙酰氨基酚而言,已鉴定出30多种靶蛋白,其中几种蛋白功能的相应改变已在组织坏死的背景下得到明确。另外,蛋白修饰可能会引发启动细胞死亡、免疫反应或改变组织基因型的信号系统。