Suppr超能文献

最佳实践:十个州烟草控制项目对指南的使用

The best practices: use of the guidelines by ten state tobacco control programs.

作者信息

Mueller Nancy B, Luke Douglas A, Herbers Stephanie H, Montgomery Tanya P

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Policy Research, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2006 Oct;31(4):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.015. Epub 2006 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention was the first national resource to define the nine required components of a comprehensive state tobacco control program. This evaluation examined how states used the guidelines in their program planning, and identifies strengths and weaknesses of the guidelines.

METHODS

During 2002-2003, data were collected and analyzed from ten state tobacco control programs on familiarity, funding, and use of the guidelines. Data were collected via written surveys and qualitative interviews with key tobacco control partners in the states. The typical number of participants interviewed was 17, representing an average of 15 agencies per state.

RESULTS

Lead agencies and advisory agencies were the most familiar with the guidelines, while other state agencies were less aware of the guidelines. Participants' prioritization of the nine components was closely related to the lead agencies' estimated category expenditures. Three states modified the guidelines to develop more-tailored frameworks. Major strengths of the guidelines included providing a basic program framework and state-specific funding recommendations. The guidelines did not address implementation strategies or tobacco-related disparities, and had not been updated with current evidence-based research.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines are important recommendations for state tobacco control programs. To continue to be useful to states, the guidelines need to be updated to address implementation and tobacco disparities, and include additional evidence-based examples. Active dissemination of updated guidelines needs to be increased beyond typical consumers to other tobacco control partners such as coalitions and other state agencies.

摘要

背景

疾病控制与预防中心的《综合烟草控制项目最佳实践》是首个界定州级综合烟草控制项目九个必备组成部分的全国性资源。本评估审视了各州在项目规划中如何运用这些指南,并确定了指南的优势与不足。

方法

在2002年至2003年期间,收集并分析了来自十个州烟草控制项目关于指南的熟悉程度、资金情况及使用情况的数据。数据通过书面调查以及与各州关键烟草控制合作伙伴的定性访谈收集。接受访谈的参与者典型数量为17人,平均每个州代表15个机构。

结果

牵头机构和咨询机构对指南最为熟悉,而其他州机构对指南的了解较少。参与者对九个组成部分的优先排序与牵头机构估计的类别支出密切相关。三个州对指南进行了修改,以制定更具针对性的框架。指南的主要优势包括提供基本的项目框架和针对各州的资金建议。指南未涉及实施策略或烟草相关差异,且未根据当前基于证据的研究进行更新。

结论

这些指南是州级烟草控制项目的重要建议。为了继续对各州有用,指南需要更新以解决实施问题和烟草差异,并纳入更多基于证据的示例。除了普通受众外,还需要加大对更新指南的积极传播力度,传播对象应扩大到其他烟草控制合作伙伴,如联盟和其他州机构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验