• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估下颌骨前后位置轮廓偏好的方法。

Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.

作者信息

Orsini M Gabriela, Huang Greg J, Kiyak H Asuman, Ramsay Douglas S, Bollen Anne-Marie, Anderson Nina K, Giddon Donald B

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7134, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.026
PMID:16979485
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Facial profile disharmonies in the anteroposterior (AP) position of the mandible are among the most frequent reasons that patients seek orthodontic treatment. Various methods are available for assessing profile preferences, and differences between them could affect treatment decisions. The purposes of this study were to compare and contrast 3 methods of evaluating profile preferences for the AP position of the mandible.

METHODS

Facial profile preferences of white orthodontists (n = 28) and white (n = 56) and Japanese-American (n = 55) laypeople were evaluated. The esthetic significance of variations in the AP position of the mandible was investigated by using 3 methods: a traditional semantic differential scale, the Perceptometrics method (Health Programs Intl, Wellesley, Mass), and the implicit association test (IAT).

RESULTS

Findings from the semantic differential scale show that, overall, there is a general preference among orthodontists and laypeople for an orthognathic profile (P <.001). Findings from the Perceptometrics method indicate that orthodontists consider the most pleasing profile to be more forward than do lay subjects (P <.001). The IAT results show a positive bias among all 3 groups toward orthognathic profiles and a negative bias toward profiles with mandibular retrognathism or prognathism. The IAT suggested that laypeople were more tolerant of mandibular prognathism in men than in women (P <.01), and more tolerant of mandibular retrognathia in white women than in men (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the benefits of using both implicit and explicit methods to assess facial profile preferences.

摘要

引言

下颌骨前后位的面部轮廓不协调是患者寻求正畸治疗最常见的原因之一。有多种方法可用于评估面部轮廓偏好,而它们之间的差异可能会影响治疗决策。本研究的目的是比较和对比三种评估下颌骨前后位面部轮廓偏好的方法。

方法

评估了白人正畸医生(n = 28)以及白种人(n = 56)和日裔美国人(n = 55)普通民众的面部轮廓偏好。通过三种方法研究下颌骨前后位变化的美学意义:传统语义差异量表、感知测量法(健康项目国际公司,马萨诸塞州韦尔斯利)和内隐联想测验(IAT)。

结果

语义差异量表的结果表明,总体而言,正畸医生和普通民众普遍更喜欢直面型(P <.001)。感知测量法的结果表明,正畸医生认为最令人愉悦的轮廓比普通受试者的更靠前(P <.001)。IAT结果显示,所有三组对直面型均存在正偏差,对下颌后缩或前突的轮廓存在负偏差。IAT表明,普通民众对男性下颌前突的容忍度高于女性(P <.01),对白种女性下颌后缩的容忍度高于男性(P =.03)。

结论

这些结果支持使用内隐和外显方法评估面部轮廓偏好的益处。

相似文献

1
Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.评估下颌骨前后位置轮廓偏好的方法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.026.
2
A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.对中国人面部轮廓美学认知的比较评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.018.
3
Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population.日本人群对美学软组织轮廓的偏好。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jul;114(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70230-6.
4
Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.下颌前后位置对日本成年人面部吸引力的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.021.
5
Ranking of facial profiles among Asians.亚洲人面部轮廓的排名。
J Esthet Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;4(4):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00679.x.
6
Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history.面部轮廓偏好:有正畸治疗史和无正畸治疗史儿童的认知差异。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.024.
7
[Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].[正畸患者面部轮廓偏好的调查]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Dec;21(6):668-72.
8
Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.颏部突出度对美学唇部轮廓偏好的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.025.
9
Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.下颌骨的前后位置与正颌手术的感知需求
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.049.
10
Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists.韩裔美国正畸患者和正畸医生的偏好概况。
World J Orthod. 2006 Fall;7(3):286-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of the Rater's Gender on Assessing Facial Beauty in Adult Patients With Vertical and Horizontal Growth Patterns.评估者性别对垂直和水平生长型成年患者面部美观评估的影响
Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63142. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Influence of social media on the esthetic perception of the lip profile of orthodontic patients.社交媒体对正畸患者唇部轮廓美学认知的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 May 10;9(5):e15870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15870. eCollection 2023 May.
3
The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.
下颌骨矢状位在面部吸引力和社会认知中的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.077-086.oar.
4
Morphometric analysis of prognathic and non-prognathic mandibles in relation to BSSO sites using CBCT.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对前突和非前突下颌骨与双颌矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)部位进行形态计量分析。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2017 Jan-Apr;7(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
5
Perception of Aesthetics by Different Professionals of Different Communities.不同群体的不同专业人士对美学的认知。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC18-22. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14045.6584. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Facial Attractiveness Assessment using Illustrated Questionnairers.使用图文问卷进行面部吸引力评估。
Clujul Med. 2015;88(1):73-8. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-403. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Chinese men compared to normal men.有吸引力的中国男性与正常男性面部软组织特征的比较。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):7977-82. eCollection 2015.
8
Comparison of soft-tissue orbital morphometry in attractive and normal Italian subjects.有吸引力的意大利人和正常意大利人的眼眶软组织形态测量比较。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):127-33. doi: 10.2319/012814-75.1.
9
Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.使用Herbst矫治器治疗的成年患者面部侧貌吸引力的变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 May;75(3):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0210-3. Epub 2014 May 15.
10
Anterior face height values in a nigerian population.尼日利亚人群的前面部高度值。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Oct;3(4):583-7. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.122121.