Kanaa Mohammad Dib, Meechan John Gerard, Corbett Ian Porter, Whitworth John Martin
School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.
J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
This randomized double-blind crossover trial investigated the efficacy and discomfort associated with slow (60 seconds) and rapid (15 seconds) inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) using 2.0 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in securing mandibular first molar, premolar and lateral incisor pulp anesthesia in 38 healthy adult volunteers. Episodes of maximal stimulation (80 microA) without sensation on electronic pulp testing were recorded. Injection discomfort was self-recorded by volunteers on 100 mm visual analogue scales. Data were analyzed by McNemar, Friedman, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks, and paired t tests. Slow IANB produced more episodes of no response to maximal pulp stimulation than rapid IANB in molars (220 episodes versus 159, p < 0.001), premolars (253 episodes versus 216, p = 0.003) and lateral incisors (119 episodes versus 99, p = 0.049). Slow IANB was more comfortable than rapid IANB (p = 0.021).
这项随机双盲交叉试验,在38名健康成年志愿者中,研究了使用2.0毫升含1:80,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因进行缓慢(60秒)和快速(15秒)下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB),在获得下颌第一磨牙、前磨牙和侧切牙髓麻醉方面的疗效和不适情况。记录电子牙髓测试中最大刺激(80微安)时无感觉的发作次数。志愿者在100毫米视觉模拟量表上自行记录注射不适情况。数据采用McNemar检验、Friedman检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和配对t检验进行分析。在磨牙(220次发作对159次,p<0.001)、前磨牙(253次发作对216次,p = 0.003)和侧切牙(119次发作对99次,p = 0.049)方面,缓慢IANB比快速IANB产生更多对最大牙髓刺激无反应的发作次数。缓慢IANB比快速IANB更舒适(p = 0.021)。