Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Alapakkam Main Road, Chennai 600095, India.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 12;58(2):278. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020278.
Periodontal surgery requires local anesthetic coverage to alleviate patient discomfort. Needles and injections can engender feelings of fear and anxiety in individuals. This study aimed to assess the level of comfort and anxiety in patients during the administration of local anesthesia using needleless jet anesthesia (JA) when compared to a conventional syringe (CS) in periodontal surgery. 60 sites were designated for injection in a split-mouth design in 30 subjects who required periodontal surgery. Local anesthesia was administered in two appointments scheduled one week apart using either a JA system or a CS. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Beck's anxiety inventory were used to report the pain and anxiety levels while injecting local anesthesia. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using the Shapiro-Wilks test and Paired t-test. Patients reported greater comfort with JA. The VAS and VRS values were statistically significant-( = 0.003) and ( = 0.001), respectively. Patients showed fear and were nervous about receiving a local anesthetic using a CS. A few subjects experienced lingering pain with the CS, whereas greater comfort and no lingering soreness were reported post-operatively at the site of JA administration. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of using JA for periodontal surgical procedures. Lower pain scores were consistently observed with the use of jet injectors. Patients were at ease and reported lesser anxiety and greater comfort with jet injectors, making it ideally suited for providing local anesthesia in periodontal surgery.
牙周手术需要局部麻醉覆盖以减轻患者不适。针和注射会引起个体的恐惧和焦虑感。本研究旨在评估在牙周手术中使用无针喷射麻醉 (JA) 与传统注射器 (CS) 相比,在给予局部麻醉时患者的舒适度和焦虑程度。 在 30 名需要牙周手术的受试者中,采用分侧设计指定了 60 个注射部位。在两次预约中,使用 JA 系统或 CS 分别在一周内给予局部麻醉。使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS)、言语评定量表 (VRS) 和贝克焦虑量表报告注射局部麻醉时的疼痛和焦虑水平。使用 Shapiro-Wilks 检验和配对 t 检验对结果进行统计学分析。 患者报告 JA 更舒适。VAS 和 VRS 值具有统计学意义-( = 0.003) 和 ( = 0.001)。患者对使用 CS 接受局部麻醉感到恐惧和紧张。少数受试者在使用 CS 后出现持续疼痛,而在 JA 给药部位,术后报告舒适度更高且无持续酸痛。 本研究首次全面评估了 JA 在牙周手术中的应用。使用喷射注射器始终观察到较低的疼痛评分。患者感到轻松,并报告喷射注射器引起的焦虑和舒适度较低,使其非常适合在牙周手术中提供局部麻醉。