• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规注射器和无针喷射麻醉技术在牙周手术中患者舒适度的比较:一项分侧随机临床试验。

A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Alapakkam Main Road, Chennai 600095, India.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 12;58(2):278. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020278.

DOI:10.3390/medicina58020278
PMID:35208601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8880158/
Abstract

Periodontal surgery requires local anesthetic coverage to alleviate patient discomfort. Needles and injections can engender feelings of fear and anxiety in individuals. This study aimed to assess the level of comfort and anxiety in patients during the administration of local anesthesia using needleless jet anesthesia (JA) when compared to a conventional syringe (CS) in periodontal surgery. 60 sites were designated for injection in a split-mouth design in 30 subjects who required periodontal surgery. Local anesthesia was administered in two appointments scheduled one week apart using either a JA system or a CS. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Beck's anxiety inventory were used to report the pain and anxiety levels while injecting local anesthesia. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using the Shapiro-Wilks test and Paired t-test. Patients reported greater comfort with JA. The VAS and VRS values were statistically significant-( = 0.003) and ( = 0.001), respectively. Patients showed fear and were nervous about receiving a local anesthetic using a CS. A few subjects experienced lingering pain with the CS, whereas greater comfort and no lingering soreness were reported post-operatively at the site of JA administration. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of using JA for periodontal surgical procedures. Lower pain scores were consistently observed with the use of jet injectors. Patients were at ease and reported lesser anxiety and greater comfort with jet injectors, making it ideally suited for providing local anesthesia in periodontal surgery.

摘要

牙周手术需要局部麻醉覆盖以减轻患者不适。针和注射会引起个体的恐惧和焦虑感。本研究旨在评估在牙周手术中使用无针喷射麻醉 (JA) 与传统注射器 (CS) 相比,在给予局部麻醉时患者的舒适度和焦虑程度。 在 30 名需要牙周手术的受试者中,采用分侧设计指定了 60 个注射部位。在两次预约中,使用 JA 系统或 CS 分别在一周内给予局部麻醉。使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS)、言语评定量表 (VRS) 和贝克焦虑量表报告注射局部麻醉时的疼痛和焦虑水平。使用 Shapiro-Wilks 检验和配对 t 检验对结果进行统计学分析。 患者报告 JA 更舒适。VAS 和 VRS 值具有统计学意义-( = 0.003) 和 ( = 0.001)。患者对使用 CS 接受局部麻醉感到恐惧和紧张。少数受试者在使用 CS 后出现持续疼痛,而在 JA 给药部位,术后报告舒适度更高且无持续酸痛。 本研究首次全面评估了 JA 在牙周手术中的应用。使用喷射注射器始终观察到较低的疼痛评分。患者感到轻松,并报告喷射注射器引起的焦虑和舒适度较低,使其非常适合在牙周手术中提供局部麻醉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/ae6c7e04b232/medicina-58-00278-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/3030f80a023a/medicina-58-00278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/849341f27d64/medicina-58-00278-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/ae6c7e04b232/medicina-58-00278-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/3030f80a023a/medicina-58-00278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/849341f27d64/medicina-58-00278-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/8880158/ae6c7e04b232/medicina-58-00278-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.常规注射器和无针喷射麻醉技术在牙周手术中患者舒适度的比较:一项分侧随机临床试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 12;58(2):278. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020278.
2
Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.无针喷射注射麻醉期间麻醉特性及疼痛的评估:一项随机临床试验
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 14;27:e20180195. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195.
3
A comparative assessment of efficacy and preference between needleless device INJEX and insulin syringe for anesthetizing primary maxillary teeth in children aged 4-9 years: A split-mouth crossover randomized clinical study.一种比较评估:在 4-9 岁儿童的上颌第一恒磨牙麻醉中,无针装置 INJEX 和胰岛素注射器的疗效和偏好:一项分口交叉随机临床试验。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;41(2):149-155. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_199_23.
4
Relief of Injection Pain During Delivery of Local Anesthesia by Computer-Controlled Anesthetic Delivery System for Periodontal Surgery: Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial.计算机控制麻醉给药系统用于牙周手术局部麻醉时缓解分娩期注射疼痛:随机临床对照试验
J Periodontol. 2016 Jul;87(7):783-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.150448. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.单牙麻醉与常规麻醉的比较:一项交叉研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3205-3213. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2413-2. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
6
Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.6至11岁牙科患者中喷射注射INJEX与局部浸润麻醉在接受度、偏好及疗效方面的比较。
Anesth Prog. 2010 Spring;57(1):3-12. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.1.3.
7
Subcutaneous administration of midazolam: a comparison of the Bioject jet injector with the conventional syringe and needle.咪达唑仑的皮下给药:Bioject喷射注射器与传统注射器和针头的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Nov;56(11):1249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90601-2.
8
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy.EMLA与无针喷射麻醉在非手术牙周治疗中的疗效比较评估。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 May-Aug;8(2):118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Is the jet injection effective for teeth extraction?喷气注射拔牙是否有效?
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;121(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.
10
Jet or conventional local anaesthesia? A randomized controlled split mouth study.喷射或传统局部麻醉?一项随机对照的分口研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6813-6819. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03968-8. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different administration methods of dexamethasone on postoperative pain and swelling following implant flap surgery: A randomized controlled trial of patient-centered outcomes.地塞米松不同给药方式对种植体瓣手术后疼痛和肿胀的影响:一项以患者为中心结局的随机对照试验
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06355-x.
2
Clinical evaluation of different types of injection systems and comparison of pain acceptance in palatal anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled split-mouth study.不同类型注射系统的临床评估及小儿患者腭部麻醉疼痛接受度的比较:一项随机对照双盲研究
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jun;25(3):191-199. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.3.191. Epub 2025 May 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.无针喷射注射麻醉期间麻醉特性及疼痛的评估:一项随机临床试验
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jan 14;27:e20180195. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0195.
2
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy.EMLA与无针喷射麻醉在非手术牙周治疗中的疗效比较评估。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 May-Aug;8(2):118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Pain measurement in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Pain and Anxiety Levels During Dental Restorations in Primary Molars: INJEX Needleless System vs Traditional Syringe.
乳牙修复过程中的疼痛和焦虑水平:INJEX无针系统与传统注射器的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Apr 18;31:e947691. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947691.
4
Comparative Evaluation of New Needleless Local Anesthetic System (INJEX) and Conventional Syringe Needle Technique during Pulpotomy Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.牙髓切断术治疗中新型无针局部麻醉系统(INJEX)与传统注射器针头技术的比较评估:一项随机临床试验
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;11(5):514. doi: 10.3390/children11050514.
口腔颌面外科中的疼痛测量
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Dec;17(4):253-263. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.4.253. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
A Needle-Free Injection System (INJEX™) with lidocaine for epidural needle insertion: A randomized controlled trial.一种用于硬膜外穿刺针插入的含利多卡因的无针注射系统(INJEX™):一项随机对照试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):756-61. doi: 10.12669/pjms.323.9174.
5
A controlled trial on the effect of hypnosis on dental anxiety in tooth removal patients.一项关于催眠对拔牙患者牙科焦虑影响的对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 24.
6
[Practical advices in choosing local anesthesia tools in dentistry. Management of carpule's quality in local anesthesia in dentistry].[牙科局部麻醉工具选择的实用建议。牙科局部麻醉中卡氏瓶质量的管理]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2014;93(2):37-9.
7
Comparison of acceptance, preference and efficacy between pressure anesthesia and classical needle infiltration anesthesia for dental restorative procedures in adult patients.成人患者牙齿修复手术中压力麻醉与传统针管浸润麻醉的接受度、偏好性及疗效比较。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Mar;17(2):169-74. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.128063.
8
Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.6至11岁牙科患者中喷射注射INJEX与局部浸润麻醉在接受度、偏好及疗效方面的比较。
Anesth Prog. 2010 Spring;57(1):3-12. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.1.3.
9
Effects of two different methods of non-surgical periodontal therapy on patient perception of pain and quality of life: a randomized controlled clinical trial.两种不同非手术牙周治疗方法对患者疼痛感知和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照临床试验
J Periodontol. 2008 Jun;79(6):1031-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070394.
10
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.