Dobbs Matthew B, Lenke Lawrence G, Kim Yongjung J, Kamath Ganesh, Peelle Michael W, Bridwell Keith H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):2400-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240212.31241.8e.
A retrospective review of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with major thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier curves treated with a selective posterior fusion using an all-hook construct versus pedicle screw construct.
To compare the clinical and radiographic results of selective posterior thoracic fusion using hooks versus pedicle screws in patients with major thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier AIS curves.
Although spontaneous lumbar curve correction often occurs following a selective thoracic spinal fusion, there are few reports that focus on selective posterior thoracic spinal fusion in the presence of a lumbar C modifier curve.
Sixty-six consecutive patients with major thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier AIS curves underwent selective posterior thoracic fusion to T12 or L1 at a single institution (1987-2001). Hooks were used for instrumentation in 32 patients and pedicle screws were used in 34 patients. Patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up. To test for differences between groups analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used.
There was no statistical difference between the preoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb values for the hook group versus the pedicle screw group. The amount of correction obtained surgically of the thoracic Cobb and the amount of spontaneous lumbar Cobb correction were significantly greater in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative coronal decompensation, with a greater than 20 mm shift to the left of the C7 plumbline, was higher in the hook group (13 patients) as compared with the pedicle screw Group 4 patients (P < 0.005). There were no complications or reoperations in either group.
Selective thoracic fusion of main thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier AIS curves with pedicle screws allowed for better thoracic correction and less postoperative coronal decompensation than seen with hooks.
对采用全钩结构与椎弓根螺钉结构进行选择性后路融合治疗的伴有主要胸段-代偿性腰段C型修正曲线的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者进行回顾性研究。
比较采用钩与椎弓根螺钉对伴有主要胸段-代偿性腰段C型修正曲线的AIS患者进行选择性后路胸段融合的临床和影像学结果。
尽管在选择性胸段脊柱融合术后常出现自发性腰段曲线矫正,但很少有报道关注存在腰段C型修正曲线时的选择性后路胸段脊柱融合。
66例连续的伴有主要胸段-代偿性腰段C型修正曲线的AIS患者在单一机构接受了至T12或L1的选择性后路胸段融合(1987 - 2001年)。32例患者使用钩进行器械固定,34例患者使用椎弓根螺钉。患者至少随访2年。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)来检验组间差异。
钩组与椎弓根螺钉组术前胸段和腰段Cobb角值无统计学差异。椎弓根螺钉组手术获得的胸段Cobb角矫正量和自发性腰段Cobb角矫正量显著更大(P < 0.001)。钩组术后冠状面失代偿(C7铅垂线向左移位大于20 mm)的发生率高于椎弓根螺钉组(13例患者对比4例患者,P < 0.005)。两组均无并发症或再次手术情况。
对于伴有主要胸段-代偿性腰段C型修正曲线的AIS患者,采用椎弓根螺钉进行选择性胸段融合比使用钩能实现更好的胸段矫正且术后冠状面失代偿更少。