• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童中枢听觉处理测试的效用分析]

[Analysis of usefulness of central auditory processes tests in children].

作者信息

Topolska Małgorzata Maria, Hassmann-Poznańska Elzbieta

机构信息

Klinika Otolaryngologii Dzieciecej AM w Białymstoku.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(3):421-4.

PMID:16989458
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic of central auditory processing should be done in some group of children, especially with learning disabilities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The audiological examination was performed in the group (n=24) of pupils from first class of secondary school (13-14 years) without any otological and neurological problems. The battery of audiological tests was used: pure tone, impedance and speech audiometry, two tests with low redundant speech: filtered speech (FS) and compressed sentences, sequencing tasks (FPT, DPT) and ABR. Normal answer: in FS - 80% correctly repeated words, FTP and DPT 75% correctly repeated sequences.

RESULTS

Results of this examination were referred to the scores of test after primary school (max 40 points). Children were divided into 3 groups: group III (33-40 points), group II (21-32), group I (0-20). Because seven children havenít had stapedial reflex we put them into special group - NR group. Tympanometry and pure tone audiometry were normal in all children. Speech audiometry was performed in intensity 30dB and correct answers were repeated in 80-100%. In compressed sentences test answers of 22 children were normal. The average dyscrimination score were: FS g. III 90%, g. II 84,3%, g. I 77,5%; FPT 89,2%, 72,9%, 62,5%; DPT 82,5%, 71,4%, 62,5%. The percentage of normal answer were: FS g. III 100%, g. II 100%, g.I 75%, FPT 100%, 42,9%, 25%, DPT 66,7%, 42,9%, 25%. The comparison between group I-III and NR was performed. The average dyscrimination score FS g. I-III 84,7%, g. NR 71,4%; FPT g. I-III 76,2%, g. NR 72,1%; DPT g. I-III 73,5%, g. NR 50,7%. The percentage of normal answer were: FS g. I-III 94,1%, g. NR 42,9%; FPT g. I-III 58,8%, g. NR 28,6%, DPT g. I-III 47,1%, g. NR 28,6%.

CONCLUSIONS

In central auditory tests (FS, FPT, DPT) worse results were in children without stapedial reflex. Good pupils (group III) had better results than poor ones (group I). The better results in audiological tests, the better scores in school test.

摘要

引言

中枢听觉处理诊断应在部分儿童群体中进行,尤其是有学习障碍的儿童。

材料与方法

对一组(n = 24)来自中学一年级(13 - 14岁)且无任何耳科和神经问题的学生进行了听力学检查。使用了一系列听力学测试:纯音、声阻抗和言语测听、两项低冗余言语测试:滤波言语(FS)和压缩句子、序列任务(FPT、DPT)以及听性脑干反应(ABR)。正常答案标准:在FS测试中,80%的单词正确重复;在FTP和DPT测试中,75%的序列正确重复。

结果

此次检查结果与小学毕业后的测试分数(满分40分)进行对比。儿童被分为三组:第三组(33 - 40分)、第二组(21 - 32分)、第一组(0 - 20分)。由于七名儿童没有镫骨肌反射,将他们归入特殊组——无反射组(NR组)。所有儿童的鼓室图和纯音听力测试均正常。言语测听在30dB强度下进行,正确答案重复率为80 - 100%。在压缩句子测试中,22名儿童的答案正常。平均辨别分数分别为:FS测试中,第三组90%、第二组84.3%、第一组77.5%;FPT测试中,89.2%、72.9%、62.5%;DPT测试中,82.5%、71.4%、62.5%。正常答案的百分比分别为:FS测试中,第三组100%、第二组100%、第一组75%;FPT测试中,100%、42.9%、25%;DPT测试中,66.7%、42.9%、25%。对第一至三组与NR组进行了比较。平均辨别分数:FS测试中,第一至三组84.7%、NR组71.4%;FPT测试中,第一至三组76.2%、NR组72.1%;DPT测试中,第一至三组73.5%、NR组50.7%。正常答案的百分比分别为:FS测试中,第一至三组94.1%、NR组42.9%;FPT测试中,第一至三组58.8%、NR组28.6%;DPT测试中,第一至三组47.1%、NR组28.6%。

结论

在中枢听觉测试(FS、FPT、DPT)中,没有镫骨肌反射的儿童结果较差。优秀学生(第三组)的结果优于成绩差的学生(第一组)。听力学测试结果越好,学校测试成绩越高。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of usefulness of central auditory processes tests in children].[儿童中枢听觉处理测试的效用分析]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(3):421-4.
2
AUDITORY TEMPORAL PROCESSING TESTS - NORMATIVE DATA FOR POLISH-SPEAKING ADULTS.听觉时间处理测试——波兰语成年人群的常模数据。
Med Pr. 2015;66(2):145-52. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00041.
3
Reference values of selected auditory temporal processing tests for Polish school children.波兰学童所选听觉时间处理测试的参考值。
Otolaryngol Pol. 2018 Sep 6;72(6):31-36. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.4366.
4
Comorbid auditory processing disorder in developmental dyslexia.发育性阅读障碍中的共病听觉处理障碍
Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):448-56. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000090437.10978.1A.
5
Children with phenylketonuria treated early: basic audiological and electrophysiological evaluation.早治疗苯丙酮尿症患儿:基本听力学和电生理学评估。
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):236-44. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826a1c99.
6
Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.听力学视角下的沟通能力。理论及对大专院校学生的应用。
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1999;50:i-iv, 1-36.
7
Assessment of the peripheral hearing system of sport divers.对运动潜水员外周听觉系统的评估。
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):515-26.
8
[The value of impedance audiometry in the hearing loss diagnosis].[阻抗测听法在听力损失诊断中的价值]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2008;62(6):764-8. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(08)70355-X.
9
Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.对有语言发育迟缓的学龄前儿童进行听力评估。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006 Sep;33(3):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
[(Central) Auditory Processing Disorders in 8 - 10-year-old children: which tests distinguish between normal and impaired children?].8至10岁儿童的(中枢性)听觉处理障碍:哪些测试能够区分正常儿童和受损儿童?
Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 Jul;88(7):469-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119403. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Auditory brainstem circuits that mediate the middle ear muscle reflex.介导中耳肌反射的听觉脑干回路。
Trends Amplif. 2010 Sep;14(3):170-91. doi: 10.1177/1084713810381771. Epub 2010 Sep 23.