Singh B N
Department of Cardiology, Wadsworth Veterans Administration Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90073.
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Sep 25;66(9):9C-20C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90757-r.
Patients who have sustained greater than or equal to 1 myocardial infarcts are at high risk for sudden death or reinfarction; the risk is highest for those with lowest ventricular ejection fraction, continuing myocardial ischemia and asymptomatic high-density and complex premature ventricular contractions. At present, beta blockers when given prophylactically are the only agents that reduce the incidence of sudden death and reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 2 years. The beneficial effect was shown to correlate with a reduction in heart rate, the effect being absent or deleterious with beta blockers with marked sympathomimetic activity. The effects of beta blockers on ventricular fibrillation appeared to be dissociated from those on premature ventricular contractions. Trials with calcium antagonists indicate that these drugs had no effect or increased the mortality rate. The divergent effect of beta blockers and calcium antagonists is unexplained but may be due in part to a lack of bradycardiac effect of calcium antagonists; there were no differences in effect among different calcium antagonists. Data from trials involving class I antiarrhythmic agents indicate that agents acting by depression of cardiac conduction are either devoid of effect or produce a modest increase in mortality. Results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, employing the newer class I agents flecainide and encainide, were used to determine whether the suppression of premature ventricular contractions in the survivors of acute MI reduces mortality. Flecainide and encainide suppressed premature ventricular contractions greater than 80%, but resulted in an increased mortality rate undoubtedly due to a marked proarrhythmic effect. Whether these data can be extrapolated to all class I agents is uncertain. Preliminary data with class III antiarrhythmic agents suggest that these agents, especially amiodarone, similarly to beta blockers, have the potential to reduce mortality in survivors of MI. Evolving data suggest that in the secondary prevention of morbid events in the survivors of acute MI, the focus must shift away from antiarrhythmic agents that delay conduction and toward beta blockers and antifibrillatory actions resulting from a prolongation of refractoriness.
发生过≥1次心肌梗死的患者猝死或再梗死风险很高;对于心室射血分数最低、持续存在心肌缺血以及有无症状的高密度和复杂性室性早搏的患者,风险最高。目前,预防性使用β受体阻滞剂是唯一能降低心肌梗死(MI)幸存者在最初2年内猝死和再梗死发生率的药物。已证明其有益作用与心率降低相关,而具有明显拟交感活性的β受体阻滞剂则无此作用或有有害作用。β受体阻滞剂对室颤的作用似乎与对室性早搏的作用无关。钙拮抗剂试验表明,这些药物无作用或增加死亡率。β受体阻滞剂和钙拮抗剂的不同作用尚无法解释,但可能部分归因于钙拮抗剂缺乏减慢心率的作用;不同钙拮抗剂之间在作用上无差异。涉及I类抗心律失常药物的试验数据表明,通过抑制心脏传导起作用的药物要么无效,要么使死亡率适度增加。心律失常抑制试验(Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial)采用新型I类药物氟卡尼和恩卡尼,以确定抑制急性心肌梗死幸存者的室性早搏是否能降低死亡率。氟卡尼和恩卡尼抑制室性早搏超过80%,但无疑由于明显的促心律失常作用导致死亡率增加。这些数据是否能外推至所有I类药物尚不确定。III类抗心律失常药物的初步数据表明,这些药物,尤其是胺碘酮与β受体阻滞剂类似,有可能降低心肌梗死幸存者的死亡率。不断发展的数据表明,在急性心肌梗死幸存者的不良事件二级预防中,重点必须从延迟传导的抗心律失常药物转向β受体阻滞剂以及因不应期延长产生的抗颤动作用。