Suppr超能文献

瓣环大小、跨二尖瓣压力和二尖瓣流速对边对边修复的影响:一项体外研究。

Effects of annular size, transmitral pressure, and mitral flow rate on the edge-to-edge repair: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Jimenez Jorge H, Forbess Joseph, Croft Laura R, Small Lisa, He Zhaoming, Yoganathan Ajit P

机构信息

Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0535, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Oct;82(4):1362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although edge-to-edge repair is an established adjunctive procedure, there is still debate on its long-term durability and efficacy.

METHODS

Fifteen porcine mitral valves were studied in a physiologic left heart simulator with a variable size annulus (dilated = 8.22 cm2, normal = 6.86 cm2, contracted = 5.5 cm2). Mitral valves were tested under steady and physiologic pulsatile flow conditions (cardiac outputs: 4 to 6 L/min), at peak transmitral pressures between 100 mm Hg and 140 mm Hg. A miniature force transducer was used to measure the Alfieri stitch force (F(A)). Mitral flow rate (MFR), transmitral pressure, effective orifice area, mitral regurgitation, and F(A) were monitored.

RESULTS

The edge-to-edge repair led to a decrease in effective orifice area of 16.55% +/- 8.22%; further reduction in effective orifice area was attained with annular contraction. Mitral regurgitation after the edge-to-edge repair was significantly higher (p <0.05) with annular dilation. In the pulsatile experiments, two peaks in F(A) were observed: one during systole (F(A) = 0.059 +/- 0.024 N) and a second during diastole (F(A) = 0.072 +/- 0.021 N). Multivariate analysis of variance analysis showed that during systole, transmitral pressure and mitral annular area (MAA) had significant effects on F(A) [F(A) = (4.40 x 10(-4)) transmitral pressure (mm Hg) + (5.0 x 10(-3)) MAA (cm2) - 0.05 (R2 = 0.80)], whereas during diastole MFR and MAA had significant effects on F(A) [F(A) = (1.03 x 10(-4)) MFR2 (L/min) - (1.60 x 10(-3)) MAA (cm2) + 0.02 (R2 = 0.90)].

CONCLUSIONS

With annular dilation, mitral regurgitation persisted even after the edge-to-edge repair. The edge-to-edge repair does not cause clinically relevant mitral valve stenosis in a normal size mitral valve. Mitral flow rate and transmitral pressure are the main determinants of F(A) during the cardiac cycle. Increasing annular area increases F(A) during systole but decreases F(A) during diastole. Systolic F(A) may become dominant with increases in MAA or peak transmitral pressure, or both.

摘要

背景

尽管缘对缘修复是一种既定的辅助手术,但关于其长期耐久性和疗效仍存在争议。

方法

在一个具有可变大小瓣环(扩张 = 8.22平方厘米,正常 = 6.86平方厘米,收缩 = 5.5平方厘米)的生理性左心模拟器中研究了15个猪二尖瓣。在稳定和生理性脉动血流条件下(心输出量:4至6升/分钟),在100毫米汞柱至140毫米汞柱的峰值跨二尖瓣压力下对二尖瓣进行测试。使用微型力传感器测量阿尔菲里缝线力(F(A))。监测二尖瓣流速(MFR)、跨二尖瓣压力、有效瓣口面积、二尖瓣反流和F(A)。

结果

缘对缘修复导致有效瓣口面积减少16.55%±8.22%;随着瓣环收缩,有效瓣口面积进一步减小。瓣环扩张时,缘对缘修复后的二尖瓣反流明显更高(p<0.05)。在脉动实验中,观察到F(A)有两个峰值:一个在收缩期(F(A)=0.059±0.024牛),另一个在舒张期(F(A)=0.072±0.021牛)。多变量方差分析表明,在收缩期,跨二尖瓣压力和二尖瓣环面积(MAA)对F(A)有显著影响[F(A)=(4.40×10⁻⁴)跨二尖瓣压力(毫米汞柱)+(5.0×10⁻³)MAA(平方厘米)-0.05(R² = 0.80)],而在舒张期,MFR和MAA对F(A)有显著影响[F(A)=(1.03×10⁻⁴)MFR²(升/分钟)-(1.60×10⁻³)MAA(平方厘米)+0.02(R² = 0.90)]。

结论

瓣环扩张时,即使进行了缘对缘修复,二尖瓣反流仍持续存在。缘对缘修复在正常大小的二尖瓣中不会导致临床相关的二尖瓣狭窄。二尖瓣流速和跨二尖瓣压力是心动周期中F(A)的主要决定因素。瓣环面积增加在收缩期增加F(A),但在舒张期降低F(A)。随着MAA或跨二尖瓣峰值压力或两者增加,收缩期F(A)可能占主导地位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验