Yushmanov Victor E, Kharlamov Alexander, Simplaceanu Elena, Williams Donald S, Jones Stephen C
Department of Anesthesiology, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(8):1087-93. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 May 23.
The differences between two models of cerebral ischemia [middle cerebral arterial transection (MCAT) and cortical photothrombosis (PT)] were explored with multiparametric MRI of apparent diffusion coefficient trace (ADCtr), cerebral blood flow (CBF) and T1. Microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2) immunoreactivity sections aligned with the MR images in the same coronal plane were used to map the infarct and to guide region-of-interest selection. In ischemic cortex, the larger T1 increase in PT versus MCAT (42+/-7% vs. 16+/-5%) is related to the different character of edema between these models; yet, neither CBF nor ADCtr discriminated between them at 3.5 h, suggesting that different mechanisms of ischemic damage to the brain cells resulted in the same ADCtr value. CBF and ADCtr were depressed in immediately adjacent ischemic border by 27+/-7% and 47+/-10%, respectively, in MCAT but not in PT, suggesting marginal perfusion in MCAT. CBF in homotopic normal cortex in the opposite hemisphere was higher for PT compared with MCAT (199+/-20 and 134+/-10 ml/100 g/min, respectively). Different pathological processes in the two models affect CBF, ADCtr and T1 in a unique, regionally specific manner. The PT model differs substantially from the MCAT and is not a model of cortical ischemia with an appreciable border zone.
利用表观扩散系数轨迹(ADCtr)、脑血流量(CBF)和T1的多参数磁共振成像(MRI),探究了两种脑缺血模型[大脑中动脉横断(MCAT)和皮质光血栓形成(PT)]之间的差异。使用与MR图像在同一冠状平面上对齐的微管相关蛋白2(MAP2)免疫反应切片来绘制梗死灶并指导感兴趣区域的选择。在缺血皮质中,PT组与MCAT组相比,T1升高幅度更大(42±7%对16±5%),这与这些模型中水肿的不同特征有关;然而,在3.5小时时,CBF和ADCtr均无法区分两者,这表明对脑细胞的不同缺血损伤机制导致了相同的ADCtr值。在MCAT模型中,紧邻的缺血边界处CBF和ADCtr分别降低了27±7%和47±10%,而在PT模型中则没有,这表明MCAT模型存在边缘灌注。与MCAT相比,PT模型对侧半球同位正常皮质的CBF更高(分别为199±20和134±10 ml/100 g/min)。两种模型中的不同病理过程以独特的、区域特异性的方式影响CBF、ADCtr和T1。PT模型与MCAT模型有很大不同,不是一个具有明显边界区的皮质缺血模型。