Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
作者信息
Marshall G S
出版信息
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev. 1987 Fall;11(1):167-92.
PMID:16998979
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.华盛顿州的替代判断与拒绝电击治疗的权利：关于舒勒案
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev. 1987 Fall;11(1):167-92.
2
Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?法院强制对非自愿入院的精神病人进行电休克治疗：一种选择权？
Gonzaga Law Rev. 1987;23(3):679-701.
3
In re Schuoler.关于舒勒案
Pac Rep Second Ser. 1986;723:1103-11.
4
The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.新泽西州拒绝治疗的权利。
Psychiatr Ann. 1976 Jun;6(6):90-92+.
5
Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?治疗法理学与被收容的精神残疾人的民权：是无望的矛盾修辞还是救赎之路？
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1995 Mar;1(1):80-119.
6
The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment.被民事强制收治的精神病人拒绝治疗的权利。
Sask Law Rev. 1983;48(2):269-91.
7
Mental health advance directives: having one's say?精神健康预先指示：能表达自己的意愿吗？
KY Law J. 2000;89(2):327-86.
8
Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.审判权利与精神药物：反对在审判期间对被告进行非自愿药物治疗的案例。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002;55(1):165-218.
9
Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Law Psychol Rev. 1993 Spring;17:41-83.
10
Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.寻求答案：质疑为确保死刑犯精神能力而强制用药的合理性。
McGeorge Law Rev. 2000 Fall;32(1):317-40.
Zotero 插件