Witt Robert L, Gillis Theresa, Pratt Robert
Department of Surgery, Christiana Care Health Systems, Wilmington, Del, USA.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2006 Aug;85(8):540-4.
We conducted a prospective study of 11 patients to (1) determine the feasibility of electrophysiologic monitoring of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) during modified radical neck dissection, (2) determine whether a threshold increase in current is required to stimulate the SAN by comparing the amount of current on initial identification of the SAN and the amount of current after completion of the dissection prior to closure, and (3) determine whether clinical outcome measures of shoulder syndrome at 72 hours and 45 days postoperatively are affected by a threshold increase. We found that 3 of 11 patients (27.3%) experienced significant threshold increases (>0.4 mA) on completion of the dissection. Of 8 patients who completed a shoulder syndrome evaluation, 3 (37.5%) had scapular winging, mild to moderate pain, and less than 90% of shoulder abduction. Two of 3 patients with shoulder syndrome had a threshold increase on electrophysiologic monitoring. We conclude that electrophysiologic monitoring of the SAN is feasible. It did not identify a threshold increase in more than 70% of patients. Electrophysiologic integrity of the SAN did not completely correlate with clinical outcome measures for shoulder syndrome.
我们对11例患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以:(1)确定在改良根治性颈清扫术中对副神经(SAN)进行电生理监测的可行性;(2)通过比较初次识别SAN时的电流量与手术结束关闭切口前的电流量,确定刺激SAN是否需要电流阈值增加;(3)确定术后72小时和45天时肩部综合征的临床结局指标是否受阈值增加的影响。我们发现,11例患者中有3例(27.3%)在手术结束时出现显著的阈值增加(>0.4 mA)。在完成肩部综合征评估的8例患者中,3例(37.5%)出现肩胛翼状畸形、轻至中度疼痛且肩部外展小于90%。3例肩部综合征患者中有2例在电生理监测时出现阈值增加。我们得出结论,对SAN进行电生理监测是可行的。超过70%的患者未发现阈值增加。SAN的电生理完整性与肩部综合征的临床结局指标并不完全相关。