Işeri Sevgül, Bulut Cemal, Yetkin Meltem Arzu, Kinikli Sami, Demiröz Ali Pekcan, Tülek Necla
Sağlik Bakanliği Ankara Eğitim ve Araştirma Hastanesi, infeksiyon Hastaliklari ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Kliniği, Ankara.
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2006 Jul;40(3):201-6.
The aim of this study was to compare the rates of brucellosis revealed by blood and bone marrow (BM) cultures obtained from patients followed up in our hospital, between 2002-2004 period. A total of 102 patients (62 male, 40 female; mean age: 39 +/- 5 years) were included to the study and 61 of them were in acute, 29 were in subacute, and 12 were in chronic stages of brucellosis. Blood and BM samples collected from all of the hospitalized patients were cultured by using the BACTEC 9050 system. The mean isolation period for BM cultures was 4.2 days, whereas it was 5.8 days for blood cultures. Overall the rate of positive blood cultures in brucellosis cases was found as 48% (n: 49), while the rate was was 34% (n: 35) for BM cultures, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Blood and BM culture positive results were detected in 40 (66%) and 28 (46%) of acute brucellosis cases, respectively. BM culture positive 23 samples yielded positive blood culture, while five were negative. These rates were found as 31% (n: 9), and 21% (n: 6) for subacute acute brucellosis cases, respectively. On the other hand Brucella spp. could not be isolated from blood cultures of 12 chronic cases, however, one (8%) was positive for BM culture. The patients were grouped according to their standard tube agglutination (STA) test results (group 1: 1/160-1/640, group 2: 1/1280-1/2560 STA titers), and when comparing these groups for their positive blood and BM culture results, the high rate in group 2 was found statistically significant (p<0.05). Nineteen (70%) of 27 patients who had previously received specific brucellosis therapy were positive for blood and/or BM cultures, indicating insufficient use of antibiotics, or the use of inappropriate antibiotic combinations. It was concluded that, since the rate of positive blood cultures were low in especially chronic brucellosis cases, bone marrow cultures should be obtained for the definite evaluation of these patients.
本研究的目的是比较2002年至2004年期间在我院接受随访的患者血液和骨髓培养所揭示的布鲁氏菌病发病率。共有102例患者(62例男性,40例女性;平均年龄:39±5岁)纳入本研究,其中61例处于布鲁氏菌病急性期,29例处于亚急性期,12例处于慢性期。使用BACTEC 9050系统对所有住院患者采集的血液和骨髓样本进行培养。骨髓培养的平均分离期为4.2天,而血液培养为5.8天。总体而言,布鲁氏菌病病例中血液培养阳性率为48%(n = 49),而骨髓培养阳性率为34%(n = 35),差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。急性布鲁氏菌病病例中,血液和骨髓培养阳性结果分别在40例(66%)和28例(46%)中检测到。骨髓培养阳性的23份样本血液培养也呈阳性,5份为阴性。亚急性布鲁氏菌病病例的这些比率分别为31%(n = 9)和21%(n = 6)。另一方面,12例慢性病例的血液培养未分离出布鲁氏菌属,但1例(8%)骨髓培养呈阳性。根据标准试管凝集(STA)试验结果对患者进行分组(第1组:1/160 - 1/640,第2组:1/1280 - 1/2560 STA滴度),比较这些组血液和骨髓培养阳性结果时,第2组的高比率具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。27例先前接受过布鲁氏菌病特异性治疗的患者中有19例(70%)血液和/或骨髓培养呈阳性,表明抗生素使用不足或使用了不适当的抗生素组合。得出的结论是,由于特别是慢性布鲁氏菌病病例血液培养阳性率较低,因此应为这些患者进行骨髓培养以进行明确评估。