Suppr超能文献

手术固定与石膏固定治疗舟状骨腰部双皮质骨折成人患者的比较:SWIFFT RCT。

Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT.

机构信息

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Alcuin Research Resource Centre Building, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(52):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta24520.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid fractures account for 90% of carpal fractures and occur predominantly in young men. Immediate surgical fixation of this fracture has increased.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with cast treatment and early fixation in adults with scaphoid waist fractures that fail to unite.

DESIGN

Multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, parallel two-arm randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation and a nested qualitative study.

SETTING

Orthopaedic departments of 31 hospitals in England and Wales recruited from July 2013, with final follow-up in September 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (aged ≥ 16 years) presenting within 2 weeks of injury with a clear, bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist on plain radiographs.

INTERVENTIONS

Early surgical fixation using Conformité Européenne-marked headless compression screws. Below-elbow cast immobilisation for 6-10 weeks and urgent fixation of confirmed non-union.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome and end point was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation total score at 52 weeks, with a clinically relevant difference of 6 points. Secondary outcomes included Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation pain and function subscales, Short Form questionnaire 12-items, bone union, range of movement, grip strength, complications and return to work.

RESULTS

The mean age of 439 participants was 33 years; 363 participants were male (83%) and 269 participants had an undisplaced fracture (61%). The primary analysis was on 408 participants with valid Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome data for at least one post-randomisation time point (surgery,  = 203 of 219; cast,  = 205 of 220). There was no clinically relevant difference in the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation total score at 52 weeks: the mean score in the cast group was 14.0 (95% confidence interval 11.3 to 16.6) and in the surgery group was 11.9 (95% confidence interval 9.2 to 14.5), with an adjusted mean difference of -2.1 in favour of surgery (95% confidence interval -5.8 to 1.6;  = 0.27). The non-union rate was low (surgery group,  = 1; cast group,  = 4). Eight participants in the surgery group had a total of 11 reoperations and one participant in the cast group required a reoperation for non-union. The base-case economic analysis at 52 weeks found that surgery cost £1295 per patient more (95% confidence interval £1084 to £1504) than cast treatment. The base-case analysis of a lifetime-extrapolated model confirmed that the cast treatment pathway was more cost-effective. The nested qualitative study identified patients' desire to have a 'sense of recovering', which surgeons should address at the outset.

LIMITATION

There were 17 participants who had initial cast treatment and surgery for confirmed non-union, which in 14 cases was within 6 months from randomisation and in three cases was after 6 months. Three of the four participants in the cast group who had a non-union at 52 weeks were not offered surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult patients with an undisplaced or minimally displaced scaphoid waist fracture should have cast immobilisation and suspected non-unions immediately confirmed and urgently fixed. Patients should be followed up at 5 years to investigate the effect of partial union, degenerative arthritis, malunion and screw problems on their quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67901257.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 24, No. 52. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

背景

舟状骨骨折占腕骨骨折的 90%,主要发生在年轻男性中。这种骨折的即刻手术固定已经增加。

目的

比较手术固定与石膏治疗和早期固定在未能愈合的舟状骨腰部骨折的成年患者中的临床效果和成本效益。

设计

多中心、实用、开放标签、平行双臂随机对照试验,具有经济评估和嵌套定性研究。

设置

英格兰和威尔士 31 家医院的矫形科于 2013 年 7 月开始招募,最终随访于 2017 年 9 月进行。

参与者

年龄在 16 岁及以上的成年人,在受伤后 2 周内出现明确的双皮质舟状骨腰部骨折,X 线片显示。

干预措施

早期使用符合欧洲标准的无头加压螺钉进行手术固定。下臂石膏固定 6-10 周,确认非愈合后立即固定。

主要结果测量

主要结局和终点是 52 周时患者腕部评估总评分,临床相关差异为 6 分。次要结局包括患者腕部评估疼痛和功能量表、短格式问卷 12 项、骨愈合、活动范围、握力、并发症和重返工作岗位。

结果

439 名参与者的平均年龄为 33 岁;363 名参与者为男性(83%),269 名参与者为无移位骨折(61%)。主要分析是对至少有一个随机后时间点(手术,219 例中有 203 例;石膏,220 例中有 205 例)有有效患者腕部评估结果数据的 408 名参与者进行的。52 周时患者腕部评估总评分无临床相关差异:石膏组平均评分为 14.0(95%置信区间 11.3 至 16.6),手术组为 11.9(95%置信区间 9.2 至 14.5),手术组调整后平均差值为 2.1 分(95%置信区间 -5.8 至 1.6;=0.27)。非愈合率较低(手术组,1 例;石膏组,4 例)。手术组 8 名参与者共发生 11 次再手术,石膏组 1 名参与者因非愈合需要再手术。52 周时的基本案例经济分析发现,手术治疗比石膏治疗每位患者多花费 1295 英镑(95%置信区间 1084 至 1504 英镑)。终身外推模型的基本案例分析证实,石膏治疗途径更具成本效益。嵌套定性研究确定了患者渴望“恢复感”,外科医生应在一开始就解决这一问题。

局限性

有 17 名参与者最初接受了石膏治疗和确认非愈合后的手术治疗,其中 14 例在随机分组后 6 个月内,3 例在 6 个月后。石膏组中有 4 名参与者中有 3 名在 52 周时发生非愈合,未接受手术治疗。

结论

无移位或轻微移位的舟状骨腰部骨折患者应采用石膏固定,并立即确认疑似不愈合,并紧急固定。应在 5 年内对患者进行随访,以调查部分愈合、退行性关节炎、畸形愈合和螺钉问题对其生活质量的影响。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN67901257。

资金

本项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助,将在;第 24 卷,第 52 期。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Surgical Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: Recommendations for Management.舟状骨骨折的手术治疗:管理建议
J Wrist Surg. 2024 Feb 9;13(3):194-201. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772689. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验