Chen Shih-Hao, Wu Po-Hui, Lee Yih-Shiunn
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Jan;127(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0225-3. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
The long-term results of pilon fractures are rarely documented. The present study evaluated the long-term results related to each fracture pattern of a pilon fracture treated with open reduction and plating.
One hundred and twenty-eight pilon fractures with a mean 10-year follow-up were divided into three groups, based on the Ruedi-Allgower classification. Group A was composed of 39 patients with Ruedi-Allgower type I fractures; group B comprised 62 patients with type II fractures; and group C included 27 patients with type III fractures. The radiographs were reviewed for adequacy of fracture reduction and posttraumatic arthrosis. At the end of follow-up, the clinical results were evaluated using a rating scale.
Group C had significantly lower excellent and good reduction rates than group A or B (P < 0.05). Groups B and C had progressively increased ankle arthrosis with time (P = 0.043, P = 0.049, respectively). Group C had more unsatisfactory clinical outcomes than group A or B (P < 0.05). Operative concurrent fixation of the fractured fibula resulted in a better outcome than non-operative treatment (P < 0.05). Open fractures had significantly lower satisfactory outcomes than closed fractures (60.5% versus 78.9%, P < 0.05).
Open reduction with plating was a reasonably effective procedure for the treatment of Ruedi type I pilon fractures. The long-term outcome of pilon fractures was affected by fracture patterns, fibular length restoration, quality of reduction, and severity of soft tissue injury. Posttraumatic arthrosis affecting the ankle after a severe pilon fracture (Ruedi type II or III) was a progressive disease, and required long-term follow-up.
关于pilon骨折的长期结果鲜有文献记载。本研究评估了切开复位钢板内固定治疗的pilon骨折各骨折类型的长期结果。
128例平均随访10年的pilon骨折患者,根据Ruedi-Allgower分类法分为三组。A组由39例Ruedi-Allgower I型骨折患者组成;B组包括62例II型骨折患者;C组有27例III型骨折患者。复查X线片以评估骨折复位情况及创伤后关节炎。随访结束时,使用评分量表评估临床结果。
C组的优良复位率显著低于A组或B组(P<0.05)。B组和C组的踝关节关节炎随时间逐渐加重(分别为P = 0.043,P = 0.049)。C组的临床结果比A组或B组更不理想(P<0.05)。骨折腓骨的手术同期固定比非手术治疗效果更好(P<0.05)。开放性骨折的满意结果显著低于闭合性骨折(60.5%对78.9%,P<0.05)。
切开复位钢板内固定是治疗Ruedi I型pilon骨折的一种合理有效的方法。pilon骨折的长期结果受骨折类型、腓骨长度恢复、复位质量和软组织损伤严重程度的影响。严重pilon骨折(Ruedi II型或III型)后影响踝关节的创伤后关节炎是一种进行性疾病,需要长期随访。