Kamikubo Yuji, Egashira Yoshihiro, Tanaka Tsunehiro, Shinoda Yo, Tominaga-Yoshino Keiko, Ogura Akihiko
Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity, Osaka University Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Machikaneyama-cho 1-1, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043 Japan.
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Sep;24(6):1606-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05032.x.
Short- and long-lasting synaptic plasticity is assumed to be the cellular basis of short- and long-lasting memory, respectively. However, the cellular consequences leading to the long-lasting synaptic plasticity, assumed to include the processes of synapse formation and elimination, remain unknown. Using hippocampal slices maintained stably in culture, we found previously that the repeated induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) triggered a slowly developing long-lasting enhancement in synaptic transmission strength accompanied by synapse formation, which was separate from LTP itself. We recently reported a phenomenon apparently of a mirror-image effect. The repeated activations of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), which induces long-term depression (LTD), triggered a long-lasting reduction in synaptic strength accompanied by synapse elimination. To clarify whether the reported long-lasting effect was specific to the drugs used previously and whether the effect was specific to mGluR-mediated LTD, we exposed the cultured slices repeatedly to another Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor agonist, and a Na+/K+-pump inhibitor. All these treatments resulted in an equivalent long-lasting synaptic reduction/elimination when repeated three times, indicating that the repeated LTD induction leads to synapse elimination. The independence of synapse elimination to the means of LTD induction suggests that the signals leading to short-term plasticity and long-term plasticity are independent. Detailed inspections in the representative case of mGluR activation revealed that the reduction in synaptic strength developed with a approximately 1-week delay from the decrease in the number of synaptic structures. This synapse elimination should be unique as it is activity-dependent rather than inactivity-dependent.
短期和长期的突触可塑性分别被认为是短期和长期记忆的细胞基础。然而,导致长期突触可塑性的细胞后果,被认为包括突触形成和消除的过程,仍然未知。利用在培养中稳定维持的海马切片,我们先前发现,长期增强(LTP)的重复诱导触发了突触传递强度的缓慢发展的长期增强,并伴有突触形成,这与LTP本身是分开的。我们最近报道了一种明显的镜像效应现象。代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluR)的重复激活,可诱导长期抑制(LTD),触发了突触强度的长期降低,并伴有突触消除。为了阐明所报道的长期效应是否特定于先前使用的药物,以及该效应是否特定于mGluR介导的LTD,我们将培养的切片反复暴露于另一种I组代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluR)激动剂、一种N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体激动剂和一种Na+/K+泵抑制剂。当重复三次时,所有这些处理都导致了等效的长期突触减少/消除,表明重复的LTD诱导导致突触消除。突触消除对LTD诱导方式的独立性表明,导致短期可塑性和长期可塑性的信号是独立的。对mGluR激活的代表性案例的详细检查显示,突触强度的降低比突触结构数量的减少延迟约1周出现。这种突触消除应该是独特的,因为它是活动依赖性的,而不是非活动依赖性的。