VanRullen Rufin
Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (UMR 5549) CNRS - Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3, Faculté de Médecine Rangueil, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Vision Res. 2006 Nov;46(24):4091-5. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.030. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
The occurrence of perceived reversed motion while observers view a periodic, continuously moving stimulus (the "continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion") has been taken as evidence that some aspects of motion perception rely on discrete sampling of visual information. The spatial extent of this sampling is currently under debate. When two separate motion stimuli are viewed simultaneously, the illusion of reversed motion rarely occurs for both objects together: this rules out global sampling of the visual field. The same result holds when the objects are superimposed by transparency: this argues against location-based sampling. Here we show that the sampling is in fact object-based: we use a rotating ring stimulus split in two halves. When the two halves move in opposite directions, appearing to belong to separate objects, perceptual reversals occur in either half at a time, but rarely in both. When the two halves physically move in compatible directions, they generally appear to reverse simultaneously: the illusion keeps the perceptual object united. Rather than the local low-level properties of the motion stimulus (which are comparable in both cases), it is thus the high-level organization of the scene that determines the extent of perceived motion reversals. These results imply that the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion, and any discrete perceptual sampling that may cause it, is restricted to the object of our attention.
当观察者观看周期性连续移动的刺激物时(即“连续的车轮错觉”),感知到反向运动的出现被视为运动感知的某些方面依赖于视觉信息离散采样的证据。目前,这种采样的空间范围仍存在争议。当同时观看两个单独的运动刺激物时,两个物体很少会同时出现反向运动的错觉:这排除了对视野的全局采样。当物体通过透明度叠加时,同样的结果也成立:这反驳了基于位置的采样。在此我们表明,采样实际上是基于物体的:我们使用一个被分成两半的旋转环刺激物。当两半以相反方向移动,看起来属于不同物体时,每次只有其中一半会出现感知上的反转,很少会两者同时出现。当两半实际以一致方向移动时,它们通常看起来会同时反转:这种错觉使感知物体保持统一。因此,决定感知到的运动反转程度的不是运动刺激物的局部低级属性(两种情况下这些属性是可比的),而是场景的高级组织。这些结果意味着,连续的车轮错觉以及任何可能导致它的离散感知采样,都局限于我们所关注的物体。