• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与物体加工相关的神经功能中的文化差异。

Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing.

作者信息

Gutchess Angela H, Welsh Robert C, Boduroglu Aysecan, Park Denise C

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Jun;6(2):102-9. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.2.102.

DOI:10.3758/cabn.6.2.102
PMID:17007231
Abstract

Behavioral research suggests that Westerners focus more on objects, whereas East Asians attend more to relationships and contexts. We evaluated the neural basis for these cultural differences in an event-related fMRI study. East Asian and American participants incidentally encoded pictures of (1) a target object alone, (2) a background scene with no discernable target object, and (3) a distinct target object against a meaningful background. Americans, relative to East Asians, activated more regions implicated in object processing, including bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left superior parietal/angular gyrus, and right superior temporal/supramarginal gyrus. In contrast to the cultural differences in object-processing areas, few differences emerged in background-processing regions. These results suggest that cultural experiences subtly direct neuralactivity, particularly for focal objects, at an early stage of scene encoding.

摘要

行为研究表明,西方人更关注物体,而东亚人则更关注关系和情境。我们在一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究中评估了这些文化差异的神经基础。东亚和美国参与者偶然对以下图片进行编码:(1) 单独的目标物体,(2) 没有可辨认目标物体的背景场景,以及 (3) 有意义背景下的独特目标物体。相对于东亚人,美国人激活了更多与物体处理相关的区域,包括双侧颞中回、左侧顶上小叶/角回和右侧颞上回/缘上回。与物体处理区域的文化差异形成对比的是,背景处理区域几乎没有差异。这些结果表明,文化体验在场景编码的早期阶段微妙地引导神经活动,尤其是对于焦点物体。

相似文献

1
Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing.与物体加工相关的神经功能中的文化差异。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Jun;6(2):102-9. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.2.102.
2
Age and culture modulate object processing and object-scene binding in the ventral visual area.年龄和文化调节腹侧视觉区域中的物体处理及物体-场景联结。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):44-52. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.1.44.
3
Cultural differences in the lateral occipital complex while viewing incongruent scenes.观看不一致场景时的外侧枕叶复合体的文化差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):236-41. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp056. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
4
Culture differences in neural processing of faces and houses in the ventral visual cortex.腹侧视觉皮层中面孔和房屋的神经加工的文化差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):227-35. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq060. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
5
Culture sculpts the perceptual brain.文化塑造感知大脑。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:95-111. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17807-X.
6
Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception.场景感知过程中眼动的文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12629-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
7
Culture-related differences in default network activity during visuo-spatial judgments.文化差异对视觉空间判断中默认网络活动的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):134-42. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr077. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
8
Cultural differences in human brain activity: a quantitative meta-analysis.人类大脑活动中的文化差异:一项定量荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062. Epub 2014 May 29.
9
Neural Activity During Mental Rotation in Deaf Signers: The Influence of Long-Term Sign Language Experience.聋人手语者心理旋转过程中的神经活动:长期手语经验的影响。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000540.
10
Group-level differences in visual search asymmetry.视觉搜索不对称性的组间差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Aug;78(6):1585-602. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1137-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.价值导向记忆:一种双过程视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;15(8):1113. doi: 10.3390/bs15081113.
2
Does culture moderate the encoding and recognition of negative cues? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.文化是否调节了消极线索的编码和识别?来自眼动研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0295301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295301. eCollection 2024.
3
Neural manifestation of L2 novel concept acquisition from multi-contexts via both episodic memory and semantic memory systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex.海马旁回皮层中地形学习机制的神经心理学证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Sep;18(6):481-508. doi: 10.1080/02643290125929.
2
Culture and the physical environment. Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances.文化与自然环境。整体与分析性的感知可供性。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x.
3
Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception.场景感知过程中眼动的文化差异。
通过情景记忆和语义记忆系统从多语境中获取L2新概念的神经表现。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1320675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1320675. eCollection 2024.
4
Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval.跨文化比较真实和虚假记忆检索的神经相关性。
Memory. 2024 Nov;32(10):1323-1340. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307923. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
The neuroscience of respect: insights from cross-cultural perspectives.尊重的神经科学:跨文化视角的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1259474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259474. eCollection 2023.
6
Neuropsychology of epilepsy surgery and theory-based practice: an opinion review.癫痫手术的神经心理学与基于理论的实践:观点综述。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 Sep;81(9):835-843. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770349. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Not so different after all? An event-related potential study on item and source memory for object-scene pairs in German and Chinese young adults.终究没那么不同?一项针对德国和中国年轻人对物体-场景对的项目和来源记忆的事件相关电位研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Sep 13;17:1233594. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1233594. eCollection 2023.
8
Do cultural differences emerge at different levels of representational hierarchy?文化差异是否出现在不同的表象层次?
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):241-253. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01459-7. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
9
Functional connectivity with medial temporal regions differs across cultures during post-encoding rest.在编码后休息期间,与内侧颞叶区域的功能连接在不同文化中存在差异。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec;22(6):1334-1348. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01027-7. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
10
Processing of an Audiobook in the Human Brain Is Shaped by Cultural Family Background.人类大脑中对有声读物的处理受到文化家庭背景的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 May 15;12(5):649. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050649.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12629-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
4
Contributions of occipital, parietal and parahippocampal cortex to encoding of object-location associations.枕叶、顶叶和海马旁回皮质对物体-位置关联编码的贡献。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):732-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.002.
5
Learning places from views: variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability.从视图中学习地点:场景处理的变化作为经验和导航能力的函数。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):73-83. doi: 10.1162/0898929052879987.
6
Cortical areas involved in object, background, and object-background processing revealed with functional magnetic resonance adaptation.通过功能磁共振适应揭示的参与物体、背景及物体-背景处理的皮质区域。
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 10;24(45):10223-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3373-04.2004.
7
Scene consistency in object and background perception.物体与背景感知中的场景一致性。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x.
8
Visual objects in context.情境中的视觉对象。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29. doi: 10.1038/nrn1476.
9
The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.空间工作记忆中基于注意力的复述发生的位置及方式。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul;20(2):194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.008.
10
Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training.神经可塑性:训练引起的灰质变化。
Nature. 2004 Jan 22;427(6972):311-2. doi: 10.1038/427311a.