Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):227-35. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq060. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Behavioral and eye-tracking studies on cultural differences have found that while Westerners have a bias for analytic processing and attend more to face features, East Asians are more holistic and attend more to contextual scenes. In this neuroimaging study, we hypothesized that these culturally different visual processing styles would be associated with cultural differences in the selective activity of the fusiform regions for faces, and the parahippocampal and lingual regions for contextual stimuli. East Asians and Westerners passively viewed face and house stimuli during an functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment. As expected, we observed more selectivity for faces in Westerners in the left fusiform face area (FFA) reflecting a more analytic processing style. Additionally, Westerners showed bilateral activity to faces in the FFA whereas East Asians showed more right lateralization. In contrast, no cultural differences were detected in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), although there was a trend for East Asians to show greater house selectivity than Westerners in the lingual landmark area, consistent with more holistic processing in East Asians. These findings demonstrate group biases in Westerners and East Asians that operate on perceptual processing in the brain and are consistent with previous eye-tracking data that show cultural biases to faces.
行为和眼动研究表明,西方人的分析处理偏向更强,更关注面部特征,而东亚人更具整体性,更关注情境场景。在这项神经影像学研究中,我们假设这些文化差异的视觉处理方式与梭状回面孔选择性活动以及杏仁旁回和舌回对情境刺激的选择性活动的文化差异有关。东亚人和西方人在功能磁共振成像实验中被动观看面孔和房屋刺激。正如预期的那样,我们在西方人的左侧梭状回面孔区域 (FFA) 观察到更多的面孔选择性,反映出更具分析性的处理方式。此外,西方人的 FFA 双侧都对面孔有反应,而东亚人则表现出更多的右侧偏侧化。相比之下,杏仁旁回位置区域 (PPA) 没有发现文化差异,尽管在舌回地标区域,东亚人对房屋的选择性强于西方人,这与东亚人更具整体性的处理方式一致。这些发现表明,在大脑的感知处理中,西方人和东亚人存在群体偏见,与之前表明对面孔存在文化偏见的眼动追踪数据一致。