Venturini M, Del Mastro L
Divisione di Oncologia, Ospedale Sacrocuore-Don Calabria, Via Sempreboni 5, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2006 Nov;32(7):548-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
The long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) on lipids and bone and cardiovascular and gynecological health are of particular interest to clinicians. The safety data of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane are limited to trials with follow-up periods of 5 years or less, and much of the data arise from comparisons with tamoxifen, a drug that has both estrogen agonist and antagonist effects. With the lack of extensive long-term data, indirect comparisons between the safety profiles of the AIs provide some insights. Although results from these indirect comparisons should be interpreted cautiously, they may assist physicians in the decision-making process. Thus far, AIs confer an increased risk of bone loss and osteoporosis and fractures, while the effects on lipid profiles and cardiovascular health seem to indicate only that AIs lack the cardioprotective and lipid-lowering effects of tamoxifen. Some data also are available from comparisons with placebo, a more appropriate comparator to investigate the tolerability and safety of a specific drug. In the MA.17 trial, patients receiving letrozole experienced similar rates of cardiovascular ischemic events and hypercholesterolemia compared with those on placebo. The significant clinical benefits of AIs compared with tamoxifen have been achieved without worsening quality of life.
芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)对脂质、骨骼、心血管及妇科健康的长期影响尤其受到临床医生的关注。阿那曲唑、来曲唑和依西美坦的安全性数据仅限于随访期为5年或更短时间的试验,且大部分数据来自与他莫昔芬(一种兼具雌激素激动剂和拮抗剂作用的药物)的比较。由于缺乏广泛的长期数据,对AIs安全性概况的间接比较提供了一些见解。尽管这些间接比较的结果应谨慎解读,但它们可能有助于医生进行决策。到目前为止,AIs会增加骨质流失、骨质疏松和骨折的风险,而对脂质谱和心血管健康的影响似乎仅表明AIs缺乏他莫昔芬的心脏保护和降脂作用。也有一些与安慰剂比较的数据,安慰剂是研究特定药物耐受性和安全性更合适的对照物。在MA.17试验中,与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受来曲唑的患者发生心血管缺血事件和高胆固醇血症的发生率相似。与他莫昔芬相比,AIs在不降低生活质量的情况下取得了显著的临床益处。