Gianfrancesco Frank D, Rajagopalan Krithika, Sajatovic Martha, Wang Ruey-Hua
HECON Associates, Inc., 9833 Whetstone Drive, Montgomery Village, MD 20886, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 15;144(2-3):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
This study evaluated treatment adherence among patients with schizophrenia receiving atypical and typical antipsychotics. Claims data for 7017 treatment episodes of commercially insured patients with schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM) receiving antipsychotics, covering the period from January 1999 through August 2003, were assessed. Overall adherence was evaluated by adherence intensity (medication possession ratio) and treatment duration (length of treatment episode). Pair-wise comparisons of the individual atypicals and a combined group of leading typical antipsychotics were undertaken using multiple regression, adjusting for differing patient characteristics. Each atypical antipsychotic demonstrated a significantly higher adherence intensity than the combined typicals, while quetiapine demonstrated a significantly greater adherence intensity than risperidone and olanzapine. None of the atypicals showed treatment durations significantly different from the typicals. While the small improvements in adherence intensity among atypical agents do not appear to be clinically important, they may reflect an underlying, stronger tendency to use filled prescriptions.
本研究评估了接受非典型和典型抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者的治疗依从性。对1999年1月至2003年8月期间接受抗精神病药物治疗的7017例商业保险精神分裂症患者(ICD-9-CM)的理赔数据进行了评估。通过依从强度(药物持有率)和治疗持续时间(治疗疗程长度)来评估总体依从性。使用多元回归对个体非典型药物和一组主要典型抗精神病药物的组合进行成对比较,并对不同的患者特征进行调整。每种非典型抗精神病药物的依从强度均显著高于典型药物组合,而喹硫平的依从强度显著高于利培酮和奥氮平。没有一种非典型药物的治疗持续时间与典型药物有显著差异。虽然非典型药物在依从强度上的微小改善似乎没有临床重要性,但它们可能反映了使用已配药处方的潜在更强倾向。