Lofors Jonas, Sundquist Kristina
Center for Family Community Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Alfred Nobels Allé 12, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
Few previous studies have analyzed the association between different dimensions of social capital and mental disorders. This study examines whether there is an association between a relatively new theoretical concept describing the amount of trust between individuals and societal institutions, i.e. linking social capital, and hospitalization due to depression or psychosis. The entire Swedish population aged 25-64, a total of 4.5 million men and women, was followed from January 1, 1997, until the first hospital admission due to depression or psychosis during the study period, or the end of the study on December 31, 1999. Small area neighborhood units were used to define neighborhoods. The definition of linking social capital was based on mean voting participation in each neighborhood unit, categorized in tertiles. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and neighborhood-level variance in four different models. The results showed strong associations between linking social capital and hospitalization due to depression or psychosis. These associations decreased considerably in both men and women, but still remained significant, after adjustment for age, housing tenure, education, employment status, marital status, and country of birth. However, the results for depression (both men and women) no longer remained significant after adjustment for neighborhood deprivation. In contrast, the results for psychosis decreased considerably but remained significant after adjustment for neighborhood deprivation. The association between low levels of voting participation and hospitalization due to depression or psychosis might reflect neighborhood differences in linking social capital, which could affect vulnerable individuals negatively. Decision-makers should take into account the evidence of a neighborhood effect on mental health in decisions regarding the sites of psychiatric clinics and other kinds of community support for psychiatric patients.
以往很少有研究分析社会资本的不同维度与精神障碍之间的关联。本研究探讨了一种描述个人与社会机构之间信任程度的相对较新的理论概念,即联系性社会资本,与因抑郁症或精神病住院之间是否存在关联。从1997年1月1日起对瑞典全体25至64岁的人口,共计450万男性和女性进行跟踪,直至研究期间因抑郁症或精神病首次住院,或至1999年12月31日研究结束。使用小区域邻里单位来定义社区。联系性社会资本的定义基于每个邻里单位的平均投票参与率,并分为三个等级。在四个不同模型中使用多水平逻辑回归来估计比值比和邻里层面的方差。结果显示联系性社会资本与因抑郁症或精神病住院之间存在很强的关联。在对年龄、住房保有情况、教育程度、就业状况、婚姻状况和出生国家进行调整后,男性和女性的这些关联均大幅下降,但仍具有显著性。然而,在对邻里贫困进行调整后,抑郁症(男性和女性)的结果不再具有显著性。相比之下,在对邻里贫困进行调整后,精神病的结果大幅下降但仍具有显著性。投票参与率低与因抑郁症或精神病住院之间的关联可能反映了联系性社会资本方面的邻里差异,这可能对易受影响的个体产生负面影响。决策者在决定精神病诊所的选址以及为精神病患者提供的其他社区支持时,应考虑到邻里对心理健康影响的证据。