Suppr超能文献

基于区域的社会资本对澳大利亚人的健康重要吗?塔斯马尼亚自我评估健康的多层次分析。

Does area-based social capital matter for the health of Australians? A multilevel analysis of self-rated health in Tasmania.

作者信息

Kavanagh Anne M, Turrell Gavin, Subramanian S V

机构信息

Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;35(3):607-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Material circumstances and collective psychosocial processes have been invoked as potential explanations for socioeconomic inequalities in health; and, linking social capital has been proposed as a way of reconciling these apparently opposing explanations.

METHODS

We conducted multilevel logistic regression of self-rated health (fair or poor vs excellent, very good, or good) on 14 495 individuals living within 41 statistical local areas who were respondents to the 1998 Tasmanian Healthy Communities Study. We modelled the effects of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and social capital (neighbourhood integration, neighbourhood alienation, neighbourhood safety, social trust, trust in public/private institutions, and political participation), and adjusted for the effects of individual characteristics.

RESULTS

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with poor self-rated health (beta = 0.0937, P < 0.001) an effect that was attenuated, but remained significant, after adjusting for individual characteristics (beta = 0.0419, P < 0.001). Social trust was associated with a reduction in poor self-rated health (beta = -0.0501, p = 0.008) and remained significant when individual characteristics (beta = -0.0398, P = 0.005) were included. Political participation was non-significant in the unadjusted model but became significant when adjusted for individual characteristics (beta = -0.2557, P = 0.045). The effects of social trust and political participation were attenuated and became non-significant when area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was included.

CONCLUSION

Area-based socioeconomic disadvantage is a determinant of self-rated health in Tasmania, but we did not find an independent effect of area-level social capital. These findings suggest that in Tasmania investments in improving the material circumstances in which people live are likely to lead to greater improvements in population health than attempts to increase area-level social capital.

摘要

背景

物质环境和集体心理社会过程被认为是健康方面社会经济不平等的潜在解释;并且,有人提出将社会资本联系起来是调和这些明显相互对立的解释的一种方式。

方法

我们对1998年塔斯马尼亚健康社区研究的41个统计局部地区内的14495名受访者的自评健康状况(一般或较差与优秀、非常好或良好)进行了多层次逻辑回归分析。我们对地区层面的社会经济劣势和社会资本(邻里融合、邻里疏离、邻里安全、社会信任、对公共/私人机构的信任以及政治参与)的影响进行了建模,并对个体特征的影响进行了调整。

结果

地区层面的社会经济劣势与自评健康状况较差相关(β = 0.0937,P < 0.001),在调整个体特征后,这种影响有所减弱,但仍然显著(β = 0.0419,P < 0.001)。社会信任与自评健康状况较差的减少相关(β = -0.0501,p = 0.008),当纳入个体特征时仍然显著(β = -0.0398,P = 0.005)。政治参与在未调整模型中不显著,但在调整个体特征后变得显著(β = -0.2557,P = 0.045)。当纳入地区层面的社会经济劣势时,社会信任和政治参与的影响减弱并变得不显著。

结论

基于地区的社会经济劣势是塔斯马尼亚自评健康的一个决定因素,但我们没有发现地区层面社会资本的独立影响。这些发现表明,在塔斯马尼亚,投资改善人们生活的物质环境可能比试图增加地区层面的社会资本更能促进人口健康的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验