• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对左侧视觉皮层进行磁刺激会损害专家的单词识别能力。

Magnetic stimulation of the left visual cortex impairs expert word recognition.

作者信息

Skarratt Paul A, Lavidor Michal

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hull, UK.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1749-58. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1749.

DOI:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1749
PMID:17014378
Abstract

One of the hallmarks of expert reading is the ability to identify arrays of several letters quickly and in parallel. Such length-independent reading has only been found for word stimuli appearing in the right visual hemifield (RVF). With left hemifield presentation (LVF), response times increase as a function of word length. Here we investigated the comparative efficiency with which the two hemispheres are able to recognize visually presented words, as measured by word length effects. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left occipital cortex disrupted expert processing of the RVF such that a length effect was created (Experiment 1). Right occipital rTMS, on the other hand, had no such effect on RVF words and nor did it modulate the length effect already present in the LVF. Experiment 2 explored the time course of these TMS-induced effects by applying single pulses of TMS at various stimulus-onset asynchronies for the same task. We replicated the TMS-induced length effect for RVF words, but only when a single pulse was applied to the left visual cortex 80 msec after target presentation. This is the first demonstration of TMS-induced impairment producing a word length effect, and as such confirms the specialization of the left hemisphere in word recognition. It is likely that anatomical differences in the pathway linking retinal input to higher level cortical processing drive this effect.

摘要

专家阅读的一个标志是能够快速且并行地识别几个字母的组合。这种与长度无关的阅读仅在右视野(RVF)中出现的单词刺激中被发现。当单词呈现在左视野(LVF)时,反应时间会随着单词长度的增加而延长。在这里,我们通过单词长度效应来研究两个半球识别视觉呈现单词的相对效率。对左侧枕叶皮质进行重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)会干扰右视野的专家级处理,从而产生长度效应(实验1)。另一方面,右侧枕叶rTMS对右视野单词没有这种影响,也没有调节左视野中已存在的长度效应。实验2通过在相同任务中以不同的刺激起始异步施加单个TMS脉冲,探索了这些TMS诱导效应的时间进程。我们复制了rTMS对右视野单词产生的长度效应,但只有在目标呈现后80毫秒对左侧视觉皮质施加单个脉冲时才会出现这种效应。这是首次证明TMS诱导的损伤会产生单词长度效应,从而证实了左半球在单词识别中的特异性。视网膜输入与更高层次皮质处理之间的通路在解剖结构上的差异可能导致了这种效应。

相似文献

1
Magnetic stimulation of the left visual cortex impairs expert word recognition.对左侧视觉皮层进行磁刺激会损害专家的单词识别能力。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1749-58. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1749.
2
Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.评估视觉单词识别的分裂中央凹模型:两个视野以及中央凹呈现单词的左右半部分中大小写交替的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(8):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.022. Epub 2005 Jan 16.
3
Why word length only matters in the left visual field.为什么单词长度只在左视野中起作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1680-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.007.
4
Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.词位影响刺激识别:早期 ERP 短期可塑性调制的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Dec;82(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
5
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.长度、格式、相邻关系、半球,以及向一侧呈现或在注视点呈现的单词的处理。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4.
6
Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.单词、脑半球及可分离的子系统:暴露持续时间、病例交替、启动以及形式连续性对左右视野单词识别的影响
Brain Lang. 2007 Dec;103(3):292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
7
The cortical representation of foveal stimuli: evidence from quadrantanopia and TMS-induced suppression.中央凹刺激的皮质表征:来自象限盲和经颅磁刺激诱导抑制的证据。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Nov;21(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.006.
8
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.旁中央凹加工中的右视野优势:来自眼动注视相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
9
Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery.动作动词与初级运动皮层:默读、频率判断和运动想象的比较性经颅磁刺激研究
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1915-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 2.
10
The "special effect" of case mixing on word identification: neuropsychological and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies dissociating case mixing from contrast reduction.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1666-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1666.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissecting the Causal Role of Early Inferior Frontal Activation in Reading.剖析早期额下回激活在阅读中的因果作用。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 8;45(2):e0194242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0194-24.2024.
2
The Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Reading Processes: A Systematic Review.经颅磁刺激对阅读过程的影响:系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Mar;33(1):255-277. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09534-7. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
3
Using neurostimulation to understand the impact of pre-morbid individual differences on post-lesion outcomes.
利用神经刺激来了解发病前个体差异对损伤后结果的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 14;114(46):12279-12284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707162114. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
4
Functional foveal splitting: evidence from neuropsychological and multimodal MRI investigations in a Chinese patient with a splenium lesion.功能性黄斑分裂:一例胼胝体病变患者的神经心理学和多模态 MRI 研究证据。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023997. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
5
Investigating occipito-temporal contributions to reading with TMS.用 TMS 研究顶颞叶对阅读的贡献。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Apr;22(4):739-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21207.