Jovicić Slobodan T, Sarić Zoran
Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology, Belgrade, Serbia.
J Voice. 2008 May;22(3):263-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.012. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
An acoustic analysis of whispered consonants in comparison to normally phonated consonants was conducted in time and intensity domains. Consonant duration and average root mean square intensity were measured for six speakers in both articulation modes. Each of 25 Serbian consonants (C) was sited between the vowel /a/ forming a syllable of /aCa/ type. Such a syllable was placed in initial, medial, and final position in the carrier sentence. Results showed that whispered consonants have a prolonged duration of about 10% on average (statistically significant, ANOVA test), and that the unvoiced consonants have a smaller time dimension extension (5.8%) than voiced ones (15.3%). Examination at subphonemic level showed that there is no difference in voice-onset-time and affrication duration in unvoiced plosives and affricates, in both whispered and phonated mode of articulation, but the difference is significant for voiced ones. Analysis of consonant duration versus place of articulation showed that palatal place is most sensitive in the process of whispering. In all experiments, the results are very consistent with respect to the subjects and test material (Pearson's correlation was between 0.6 and 0.9). In intensity domain, all unvoiced consonants in whispered mode of articulation have almost unchanged intensity in comparison to phonated mode (the difference is maximum 3.5 dB). On the contrary, voiced consonants in the whispered mode were reduced in intensity by as much as 25 dB, as nasals and semivowels. Average intensity of whispered consonants is lowered by 12d B in comparison to phonated ones, and does not depend on syllabic position inside the sentences.
在时间和强度域中,对低语辅音与正常发声辅音进行了声学分析。在两种发音模式下,测量了六位说话者的辅音时长和平均均方根强度。25个塞尔维亚辅音(C)中的每一个都位于元音/a/之间,形成/aCa/类型的音节。这样的音节被置于载体句子的开头、中间和结尾位置。结果表明,低语辅音的时长平均延长约10%(具有统计学意义,方差分析测试),并且清辅音的时间维度扩展(5.8%)小于浊辅音(15.3%)。在亚音素水平上的检查表明,在低语和发声发音模式下,清塞音和塞擦音的起音时间和擦音时长没有差异,但浊音的差异显著。辅音时长与发音部位的分析表明,腭音部位在低语过程中最敏感。在所有实验中,关于受试者和测试材料,结果非常一致(皮尔逊相关系数在0.6到0.9之间)。在强度域中,与发声模式相比,低语发音模式下的所有清辅音强度几乎没有变化(差异最大为3.5分贝)。相反,低语模式下的浊辅音强度降低了多达25分贝,如鼻音和半元音。与发声辅音相比,低语辅音的平均强度降低了12分贝,并且不取决于句子中的音节位置。