Suppr超能文献

宫颈细胞学实验室筛查错误的时间特征。

Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.

作者信息

Mitchell Heather, Hocking Jane, Saville Marion

机构信息

Victorian Cytology Service, Carlton South, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2006 Sep-Oct;50(5):492-8. doi: 10.1159/000326002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the temporal characteristics of laboratory false negative reports in cervical cytology.

STUDY DESIGN

The temporal characteristics of 198 false negative cervical cytology cases were compared with those of 750,805 control cases.

RESULTS

The false negative rate did not vary significantly by month, day of the week or time of day. The false negative rate was lowest for slides that took between 4 and 5 minutes to screen and increased significantly with screening times that were longer than 5 minutes. The false negative rate did not vary by the number of cases already authorized in a given day. After 40 cases had been authorized in a given day, the false negative rate fell for subsequent cases, but this did not reach statistical significance. The false negative rate was higher during periods when prescreening was performed.

CONCLUSION

Further studies of the relationship between time and false negative reports are needed. These would provide an evidence base to help promote safe working practices within laboratories and a more objective setting of maximum daily productivity levels for cytotechnologists.

摘要

目的

探讨宫颈细胞学检查中实验室假阴性报告的时间特征。

研究设计

将198例假阴性宫颈细胞学病例的时间特征与750,805例对照病例的时间特征进行比较。

结果

假阴性率在月份、星期几或一天中的时间上没有显著差异。筛查时间在4至5分钟之间的玻片假阴性率最低,筛查时间超过5分钟时假阴性率显著增加。假阴性率不因给定日期已核准的病例数而异。在给定日期核准40例病例后,后续病例的假阴性率下降,但未达到统计学显著性。在进行预筛查期间,假阴性率较高。

结论

需要进一步研究时间与假阴性报告之间的关系。这些研究将提供证据基础,以帮助促进实验室的安全工作实践,并为细胞技术人员更客观地设定每日最高生产力水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验