Gherlinzoni F, Guglielmi C, Mazza P, Amadori S, Mandelli F, Tura S
L. and A. Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Semin Oncol. 1990 Dec;17(6 Suppl 10):3-8; discussion 8-9.
From September 1984 to July 1986, 70 previously untreated patients with Stage II to IV intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (according to the International Working Formulation) were enrolled in a phase III comparative trial. The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and safety of using mitoxantrone instead of doxorubicin in the combination chemotherapeutic regimen m-BACOD (intermediate-dose methotrexate, bleomycin, Adriamycin [doxorubicin, Adria Laboratories], cyclophosphamide, Oncovin [vincristine, Eli Lilly and Company], and dexamethasone). Seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive either m-BN (Novantrone; mitoxantrone, American Cyanamid Company) COD or m-BACOD. The complete-response rate was 57% in both treatment groups, and no significant differences in overall or relapse-free survival were recorded between the two groups. Patients treated with m-BACOD experienced severe alopecia more frequently (P less than .001) and reported six adverse cardiac events of grade greater than 1 whereas neither was observed among those receiving m-BNCOD. The mitoxantrone-containing regimen was found to have an equivalent efficacy and reduced clinical toxicity in comparison to the standard doxorubicin-containing regimen in patients with poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
1984年9月至1986年7月,70例先前未经治疗的II至IV期中级或高级非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者(根据国际工作分类法)被纳入一项III期对照试验。该研究的目的是比较在联合化疗方案m-BACOD(中剂量甲氨蝶呤、博来霉素、阿霉素[多柔比星,阿德里亚实验室]、环磷酰胺、长春新碱[长春新碱,礼来公司]和地塞米松)中使用米托蒽醌而非阿霉素的疗效和安全性。70例患者被随机分配接受m-BN(诺凡托;米托蒽醌,美国氰胺公司)COD或m-BACOD治疗。两个治疗组的完全缓解率均为57%,两组在总生存期或无复发生存期方面均未记录到显著差异。接受m-BACOD治疗的患者更频繁地出现严重脱发(P小于0.001),并报告了6例1级以上的不良心脏事件,而接受m-BNCOD治疗的患者中均未观察到这些情况。与含标准阿霉素的方案相比,含米托蒽醌的方案在预后不良的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中具有等效疗效且临床毒性降低。