Suppr超能文献

杏仁核活动的个体差异可预测工作记忆期间的反应速度。

Individual differences in amygdala activity predict response speed during working memory.

作者信息

Schaefer Alexandre, Braver Todd S, Reynolds Jeremy R, Burgess Gregory C, Yarkoni Tal, Gray Jeremy R

机构信息

Psychology Department, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10120-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567-06.2006.

Abstract

The human amygdala has classically been viewed as a brain structure primarily related to emotions and dissociated from higher cognition. We report here findings suggesting that the human amygdala also has a role in supporting working memory (WM), a canonical higher cognitive function. In a first functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study (n = 53), individual differences in amygdala activity predicted behavioral performance in a 3-back WM task. Specifically, higher event-related amygdala amplitude predicted faster response time (RT; r = -0.64), with no loss of accuracy. This relationship was not contingent on mood state, task content, or personality variables. In a second fMRI study (n = 21), we replicated the key finding (r = -0.47) and further showed that the correlation between the amygdala and faster RT was specific to a high working memory load condition (3-back) compared with a low working memory load condition (1-back). These results support models of amygdala function that can account for its involvement not only in emotion but also higher cognition.

摘要

传统上,人类杏仁核被视为主要与情绪相关的脑结构,与高级认知功能无关。我们在此报告的研究结果表明,人类杏仁核在支持工作记忆(WM)方面也发挥着作用,而工作记忆是一种典型的高级认知功能。在第一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究(n = 53)中,杏仁核活动的个体差异预测了3-back工作记忆任务中的行为表现。具体而言,较高的事件相关杏仁核振幅预测了更快的反应时间(RT;r = -0.64),且准确性未受影响。这种关系不取决于情绪状态、任务内容或个性变量。在第二项fMRI研究(n = 21)中,我们重复了这一关键发现(r = -0.47),并进一步表明,与低工作记忆负荷条件(1-back)相比,杏仁核与更快反应时间之间的相关性在高工作记忆负荷条件(3-back)下更为显著。这些结果支持了杏仁核功能模型,该模型不仅可以解释其在情绪方面的作用,还能解释其在高级认知方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in amygdala activity predict response speed during working memory.
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10120-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567-06.2006.
2
Performance dissociation during verbal and spatial working memory tasks.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Aug;105(1):243-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.105.1.243-250.
3
Individual differences in neural activity during a facial expression vs. identity working memory task.
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.051. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
4
Cognitive versus automatic mechanisms of mood induction differentially activate left and right amygdala.
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2503-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.013. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
5
A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory.
Neuroimage. 1997 Jan;5(1):49-62. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0247.
8
Variation of human amygdala response during threatening stimuli as a function of 5'HTTLPR genotype and personality style.
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 15;57(12):1517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.031.

引用本文的文献

3
Multiple group membership and executive function in a socioeconomically diverse sample.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60534-4.
4
Correlation Between Amygdala Nuclei Volumes and Memory in Cognitively Normal Adults Carrying the ApoE ε3/ε3 Allele.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Dec 13;13:747288. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.747288. eCollection 2021.
6
Amygdala Activation in Cognitive Task fMRI Varies with Individual Differences in Cognitive Traits.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):254-264. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00863-3. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Stress-Related Neuronal Clusters in Sublenticular Extended Amygdala of Basal Forebrain Show Individual Differences of Positions.
Front Neural Circuits. 2020 May 28;14:29. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2020.00029. eCollection 2020.
8
Cortical thickness, neurocognitive, and body composition effects of fasting during Ramadan.
J Res Med Sci. 2019 Jun 25;24:50. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_783_18. eCollection 2019.
9
Functional Involvement of Human Periaqueductal Gray and Other Midbrain Nuclei in Cognitive Control.
J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 31;39(31):6180-6189. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2043-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):648-63. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648.
3
Task and content modulate amygdala-hippocampal connectivity in emotional retrieval.
Neuron. 2006 Feb 16;49(4):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.025.
4
Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jan;7(1):54-64. doi: 10.1038/nrn1825.
5
Modulation of retrieval processing reflects accuracy of emotional source memory.
Learn Mem. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):472-9. doi: 10.1101/lm.84305.
6
Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Jun;5(2):182-90. doi: 10.3758/cabn.5.2.182.
7
9
Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites.
Science. 2004 Dec 17;306(5704):2061. doi: 10.1126/science.1103617.
10
Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jun;174(1):126-35. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1732-3. Epub 2004 Jan 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验