Cremieux Pierre, Vekeman Francis, Lefebvre Patrick
Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA 02199, USA.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2006 Sep;12(3):165-78. doi: 10.1177/1078155206069925.
To determine the dose-conversion ratio (DCR) between epoetin alfa and darb-epoetin alfa in cancer patients and compare the treatment costs of both agents at the estimated DCRs.
A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out on clinical trials evaluating patients with chemotherapy-related anemia treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. A multivariate meta-analysis regression was conducted to determine the relative doses of these two agents at which they were equally effective. The effectiveness measure used was the area under the hemoglobin change curve. Using the estimated DCR for each dosing regimen, the relative cost of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa treatments in Canada was evaluated.
Twenty-nine study arms, evaluating 12,923 patients (10,582 treated with epoetin alfa and 2341 treated with darbepoetin alfa), were eligible for this study. Results comparing specific dosing regimens indicated that the DCRs were systematically lower than 200:1. The cost premium associated with darbepoetin alfa weekly drug cost was between 37 and 44% above epoetin alfa for the same level of effectiveness.
Based on the evidence from this meta-analysis, epoetin alfa appeared to be more cost-effective compared to darbepoetin alfa in Canada for cancer patients.
确定癌症患者中阿法依泊汀与达贝泊汀α之间的剂量转换比(DCR),并比较在估计的DCR下两种药物的治疗成本。
对评估接受阿法依泊汀或达贝泊汀α治疗的化疗相关性贫血患者的临床试验进行全面文献检索。进行多变量荟萃分析回归以确定这两种药物等效时的相对剂量。使用的有效性指标是血红蛋白变化曲线下的面积。利用每种给药方案的估计DCR,评估了加拿大阿法依泊汀和达贝泊汀α治疗的相对成本。
29个研究组,共评估了12923例患者(10582例接受阿法依泊汀治疗,2341例接受达贝泊汀α治疗)符合本研究条件。特定给药方案的比较结果表明,DCR系统性低于200:1。在相同有效性水平下,达贝泊汀α每周药物成本的成本溢价比阿法依泊汀高37%至44%。
基于该荟萃分析的证据,在加拿大,对于癌症患者,阿法依泊汀似乎比达贝泊汀α更具成本效益。