Velten Florian W, Rambow Florian, Metharom P, Goerdt Sergij
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Mol Immunol. 2007 Mar;44(7):1544-50. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
Although standardized protocols are widely used for the generation of monocyte-derived immunostimulatory dendritic cells (DC(ims)), the inducibility of Th1 cells by DC(ims) may considerably differ. As a measure for the quality of DC(ims) generated from an individual donor at a certain time point, CD83 is used in combination with HLA-DR and CD86 to assess DC maturation. When phenotypically analyzing DC(ims), we identified a subpopulation ( approximately 60%) of CD83+, CD86+, and HLA-DR+ DC(ims) that co-expressed CD25. DC within a given DC(ims) preparation identified by lower expression of CD83 and by selective expression of CD14, however, did not co-express CD25. In order to establish CD25 as an additional maturation marker of DC(ims), we studied the DC phenotype of these cells as well as the DC-dependent T-cell proliferation and T-cell cytokine production profile after co-incubation with sorted CD25(high) and CD25(low) subpopulations of CD83+, HLA-DR+, CD86+ DC(ims). CD25(high) DC(ims) showed significant up-regulation of the DC activation molecule CD43 and induced increased levels of IL-2 secretion in allogeneic T-cells (170.7+/-86.7pg/mL) as compared to T-cells coincubated with CD25(low) DC(ims) (86.6+/-37.6pg/mL) [p=0.0224]. This was reflected by a significantly lower T-cell stimulatory capacity of CD25(low) DC(ims) (84.0% of CD25(high) DC(ims), 1:10 ratio; p=0.014) whereas the T-cell stimulatory capacity of CD25(low) DC(ims) was much higher when compared to IL-10 induced regulatory DC (55.3% of CD25(high) DC(ims); 1:10 ratio). With regard to cancer vaccination protocols, we propose to use CD25 and CD43 as additional markers for DC quality control, assessment of maturational status, and positive selection.
尽管标准化方案被广泛用于生成单核细胞来源的免疫刺激树突状细胞(DC(ims)),但DC(ims)对Th1细胞的诱导能力可能有很大差异。作为在某个时间点从个体供体生成的DC(ims)质量的一种衡量指标,CD83与HLA-DR和CD86联合使用以评估DC成熟度。在对DC(ims)进行表型分析时,我们鉴定出一个亚群(约60%)的CD83+、CD86+和HLA-DR+ DC(ims),它们共表达CD25。然而,在给定的DC(ims)制剂中,通过较低的CD83表达和CD14的选择性表达鉴定出的DC不共表达CD25。为了将CD25确立为DC(ims)的另一个成熟标志物,我们研究了这些细胞的DC表型以及与分选的CD25(高)和CD25(低)亚群的CD83+、HLA-DR+、CD86+ DC(ims)共孵育后DC依赖的T细胞增殖和T细胞细胞因子产生谱。与与CD25(低) DC(ims)共孵育的T细胞(86.6±37.6pg/mL)相比,CD25(高) DC(ims)显示DC激活分子CD43显著上调,并诱导同种异体T细胞中IL-2分泌水平增加(170.7±86.7pg/mL)[p = 0.0224]。这反映在CD25(低) DC(ims)的T细胞刺激能力显著较低(CD25(高) DC(ims)的84.0%,1:10比例;p = 0.014),而与IL-10诱导的调节性DC相比,CD25(低) DC(ims)的T细胞刺激能力要高得多(CD25(高) DC(ims)的55.3%;1:10比例)。关于癌症疫苗接种方案,我们建议使用CD25和CD43作为DC质量控制、成熟状态评估和阳性选择的额外标志物。