Bilgili M Sinan, Demir Ahmet, Ozkaya Bestamin
Yildiz Technical University, Environmental Engineering Department, 34349 Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Hazard Mater. 2007 May 8;143(1-2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Sep 10.
In this study, the effect of leachate recirculation on aerobic and anaerobic degradation of municipal solid wastes is determined by four laboratory-scale landfill reactors. The options studied and compared with the traditional anaerobic landfill are: leachate recirculation, landfill aeration, and aeration with leachate recirculation. Leachate quality is regularly monitored by the means of pH, alkalinity, total dissolved solids, conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential, chloride, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen, in addition to generated leachate quantity. Aerobic leachate recirculated landfill appears to be the most effective option in the removal of organic matter and ammonia. The main difference between aerobic recirculated and non-recirculated landfill options is determined at leachate quantity. Recirculation is more effective on anaerobic degradation of solid waste than aerobic degradation. Further studies are going on to determine the optimum operational conditions for aeration and leachate recirculation rates, also with the operational costs of aeration and recirculation.
在本研究中,通过四个实验室规模的垃圾填埋场反应器确定渗滤液再循环对城市固体废物好氧和厌氧降解的影响。所研究并与传统厌氧填埋场进行比较的方案有:渗滤液再循环、填埋场曝气以及渗滤液再循环曝气。除了产生的渗滤液量外,还通过pH值、碱度、总溶解固体、电导率、氧化还原电位、氯化物、化学需氧量、氨和凯氏氮总量来定期监测渗滤液质量。好氧渗滤液再循环填埋场似乎是去除有机物和氨最有效的方案。好氧再循环和非再循环填埋场方案的主要区别在于渗滤液量。再循环对固体废物厌氧降解的效果比对好氧降解更有效。正在进行进一步研究以确定曝气和渗滤液再循环速率的最佳运行条件,以及曝气和再循环的运行成本。