Suppr超能文献

环扎技术的临床、影像学及成本比较:钢丝与缆线

A clinical, radiographic, and cost comparison of cerclage techniques: wires vs cables.

作者信息

Ritter Merrill A, Lutgring Joseph D, Davis Kenneth E, Berend Michael E, Meding John B

机构信息

Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St Francis Hospital, Mooresville, Mooresville, IN 46158, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2006 Oct;21(7):1064-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.002.

Abstract

The cerclage technique is used to secure femoral fractures, allografts, and plates. It is not clear whether wires or cables are better suited for this technique. A retrospective radiographic review of the 6,460 total hip arthroplasties done between 1986 and 2003 was performed. Wires/cables were used in 249 hips. It was found that one cable was broken (0.92%) compared with 11 wires (1.72%) (P < .5373). It was found that there was no statistical difference in Harris hip function or pain scores between patients with wires and those with cables or between those with broken wires/cables and those without broken wires/cables. The Luque wires, which cost 29.79 US dollars each, performed equally to the cables, which cost 275.40 US dollars each, suggesting that wiring may be the preferred cerclage technique.

摘要

环扎技术用于固定股骨骨折、同种异体移植物和钢板。目前尚不清楚钢丝或缆线是否更适合该技术。对1986年至2003年间进行的6460例全髋关节置换术进行了回顾性影像学研究。249例髋关节使用了钢丝/缆线。结果发现,1根缆线断裂(0.92%),而11根钢丝断裂(1.72%)(P<0.5373)。结果发现,使用钢丝的患者与使用缆线的患者之间,以及钢丝/缆线断裂的患者与未断裂的患者之间,Harris髋关节功能或疼痛评分没有统计学差异。每根成本为29.79美元的鲁克钢丝与每根成本为275.40美元的缆线表现相同,这表明钢丝可能是首选的环扎技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验