Holland-Cunz Stefan, Chmelnik Martin, Roll Maria, Günther Patrick, Schäfer Karl-Herbert
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe Seyler Strasse 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Jan;23(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1803-8. Epub 2006 Oct 7.
In contrast to adult surgery, the neonatal small intestine confronts the surgeon, depending on the age of the patient, with variable diameters of the intestine. Therefore, anastomoses are usually performed by hand with interrupted sutures. In the presented study, a new technique is demonstrated. An anastomosis in the distal ileum of Sprague Dawley rats was performed with a single clamp applicator (Anastoclip). Small bowel anastomoses were performed in 32 rats. The clipped bowel anastomosis was evaluated concerning stenosis, leakage, and adhesions in comparison to the sutured anastomosis. Tension test and X-ray examination were performed to measure the stability. The rats were sacrificed at day 3 or 14 after laparotomy. The clipped anastomosis is feasible, and faster to perform than the conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (Operation time: control group: 18.5 min versus clipped group 4 min; p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were differences in the mechanical stability, with higher tension forces needed for rupturing the clipped anastomosis. There were fewer stenoses (16.5 mm stenotic diameter in the control group versus 20.6 mm in the clipped group) and fewer adhesions in the group of the clipped anastomosis. Histological examinations were performed and did not show significant differences between the two groups. In the animal model presented, the clipped, intestinal, non-perforating anastomosis (CINPA) shows advantages compared to the common hand-sutured anastomosis.
与成人手术不同,新生儿小肠因患者年龄不同,肠管直径各异,这给外科医生带来了挑战。因此,吻合术通常采用手工间断缝合。在本研究中,展示了一种新技术。使用单夹施夹器(吻合夹)对Sprague Dawley大鼠的回肠末端进行吻合。对32只大鼠进行小肠吻合术。将吻合夹吻合的肠管与缝合吻合的肠管在狭窄、渗漏和粘连方面进行评估。进行张力测试和X线检查以测量稳定性。在剖腹术后第3天或第14天处死大鼠。吻合夹吻合是可行的,且比传统手工缝合吻合术操作更快(手术时间:对照组18.5分钟,吻合夹组4分钟;p>0.05)。此外,在机械稳定性方面存在差异,吻合夹吻合破裂所需的张力更高。吻合夹吻合组的狭窄更少(对照组狭窄直径为16.5毫米,吻合夹组为20.6毫米),粘连也更少。进行了组织学检查,两组之间未显示出显著差异。在本动物模型中,与普通手工缝合吻合术相比,吻合夹非穿孔性肠吻合术(CINPA)显示出优势。