Sachs Gary S
Partners Bipolar Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67 Suppl 11:12-7.
Manic and mixed episodes can be challenging to treat despite published guidelines and algorithms. An alternative iterative approach that offers evidence-based treatment options at critical decision points may help to individualize care. Implementing such an approach begins with making a diagnosis and recognizing individual patient factors, weighing treatment options, and developing a menu of reasonable treatment choices based on the best available evidence. A critical review of the evidence is needed to ensure that interventions with the highest quality evidence are offered preferentially and that relevant individual factors are considered. Educating patients, negotiating treatment options, and selecting a pathway of care with the patient are important steps before initiating an intervention. After initiating an intervention, follow-up proceeds by measuring efficacy and adverse events with the aim of determining whether or not the patient is benefiting from treatment. Based on this knowledge, new individual factors are known and new evidence can be reviewed, so the cycle begins again. Using this iterative approach to treat patients with bipolar disorder in manic and mixed episodes promotes personalized care and relies on understanding the quality of evidence for the treatments commonly used to treat these phases of bipolar disorder.
尽管有已发表的指南和算法,但躁狂发作和混合发作的治疗仍具有挑战性。一种在关键决策点提供循证治疗方案的替代迭代方法可能有助于实现个性化护理。实施这种方法首先要进行诊断并识别个体患者因素,权衡治疗方案,并根据现有最佳证据制定合理的治疗选择清单。需要对证据进行严格审查,以确保优先提供具有最高质量证据的干预措施,并考虑相关的个体因素。在开始干预之前,对患者进行教育、协商治疗方案并与患者选择护理途径是重要步骤。开始干预后,通过测量疗效和不良事件进行随访,目的是确定患者是否从治疗中获益。基于这些信息,新的个体因素得以明确,新的证据可以得到审查,于是循环再次开始。使用这种迭代方法治疗躁狂发作和混合发作的双相情感障碍患者可促进个性化护理,并依赖于了解常用于治疗双相情感障碍这些阶段的治疗方法的证据质量。