van Geel Antonia C M, Geusens Piet P, Nagtzaam Ivo F, Schreurs Cyril M J R, van der Voort Danny J M, Rinkens Paula E L M, Kester Arnold D M, Dinant Geert-Jan
Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Med. 2006 Oct 9;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-24.
Many risk factors for fractures have been documented, including low bone-mineral density (BMD) and a history of fractures. However, little is known about the short-term absolute risk (AR) of fractures and the timing of clinical fractures. Therefore, we assessed the risk and timing of incident clinical fractures, expressed as 5-year AR, in postmenopausal women.
In total, 10 general practice centres participated in this population-based prospective study. Five years after a baseline assessment, which included clinical risk factor evaluation and BMD measurement, 759 postmenopausal women aged between 50 and 80 years, were re-examined, including undergoing an evaluation of clinical fractures after menopause. Risk factors for incident fractures at baseline that were significant in univariate analyses were included in a multivariate Cox survival regression analysis. The significant determinants were used to construct algorithms.
In the total group, 12.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.1-14.9) of the women experienced a new clinical fracture. A previous clinical fracture after menopause and a low BMD (T-score <-1.0) were retained as significant predictors with significant interaction. Women with a recent previous fracture (during the past 5 years) had an AR of 50.1% (95% CI 42.0-58.1) versus 21.2% (95% CI 20.7-21.6) if the previous fracture had occurred earlier. In women without a fracture history, the AR was 13.8% (95% CI 10.9-16.6) if BMD was low and 7.0% (95% CI 5.5-8.5) if BMD was normal.
In postmenopausal women, clinical fractures cluster in time. One in two women with a recent clinical fracture had a new clinical fracture within 5 years, regardless of BMD. The 5-year AR for a first clinical fracture was much lower and depended on BMD.
已记录了许多骨折的危险因素,包括低骨矿物质密度(BMD)和骨折病史。然而,对于骨折的短期绝对风险(AR)以及临床骨折的发生时间知之甚少。因此,我们评估了绝经后女性发生临床骨折的风险和时间,以5年AR表示。
共有10个全科医疗中心参与了这项基于人群的前瞻性研究。在包括临床危险因素评估和BMD测量的基线评估5年后,对759名年龄在50至80岁之间的绝经后女性进行了重新检查,包括对绝经后临床骨折的评估。在单变量分析中具有显著意义的基线时新发骨折的危险因素被纳入多变量Cox生存回归分析。显著的决定因素被用于构建算法。
在整个研究组中,12.5%(95%置信区间(CI)10.1 - 14.9)的女性发生了新的临床骨折。绝经后既往临床骨折和低BMD(T值< -1.0)作为具有显著交互作用的显著预测因素被保留。近期(过去5年内)有骨折史的女性5年AR为50.1%(95% CI 42.0 - 58.1),而如果既往骨折发生时间更早,则为21.2%(95% CI 20.7 - 21.6)。在无骨折病史的女性中,如果BMD低,5年AR为13.8%(95% CI 10.9 - 16.6),如果BMD正常,则为7.0%(95% CI 5.5 - 8.5)。
在绝经后女性中,临床骨折在时间上聚集。近期发生临床骨折的女性中有二分之一在5年内发生了新的临床骨折,与BMD无关。首次临床骨折的5年AR要低得多,且取决于BMD。