Monetary and nonmonetary accountability following adverse medical events: options for Canadian patients.
作者信息
Gray John E, Beilby William
机构信息
Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, ON.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):903. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061072.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Monetary and nonmonetary accountability following adverse medical events: options for Canadian patients.医疗不良事件后的货币与非货币问责制：加拿大患者的选择
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):903. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061072.
2
Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.医疗护理不良事件后患者寻求的问责制：新西兰的经验
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):889-94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060429.
3
Physician accountability, patient safety and patient compensation.医生问责制、患者安全与患者赔偿。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2006;42(2):14-6.
4
Medical injuries and malpractice: is it time for "no fault"?医疗伤害与医疗事故：是时候实行“无过错”原则了吗？
Health Law J. 1993;1:97-117.
5
[Dissuasion and no-fault].[劝阻与无过错]
Health Law J. 2001;9:171-81.
6
7
Medical malpractice: an overview of federal and state policy options.医疗事故：联邦和州政策选项概述
Issue Brief (Public Policy Inst (Am Assoc Retired Pers)). 2005 Jul(IB75):1-14.
8
No fault compensation for medical errors: who wins?医疗差错的无过错赔偿：谁是赢家？
N Z Med J. 2002 Jan 25;115(1146):24; author reply 24.
9
The ethics of medical misadventure.医疗意外的伦理问题。
Res Publica. 2003;12(1):12-5.
10
No-fault compensation for medical errors: who wins?医疗差错的无过错赔偿：谁是赢家？
N Z Med J. 2001 Nov 23;114(1144):527.
本文引用的文献
1
Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.医疗护理不良事件后患者寻求的问责制：新西兰的经验
CMAJ. 2006 Oct 10;175(8):889-94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060429.
Zotero 插件