Johnsen Skjalg E, Svensson Krister G, Trulsson Mats
Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 4064, 141 04, Huddinge, Sweden.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Mar;178(1):126-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0719-9. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
Hold-and-split tasks were performed by 20 subjects (12 females and 8 males) using the right central incisors, canines, 2nd premolars, and 1st molars, respectively. Half a peanut was positioned on a transducer-equipped plate and the subject was instructed to hold the plate with the peanut between two antagonistic teeth, and not using more force than necessary. After ca. 3 s the subject was instructed to split the peanut in a natural manner. Each session consisted of a series of three in which the subject performed the hold-and-split task five times for each tooth. Thus, in total, data were obtained from 60 trials for each subject. The magnitude of the forces and the force rates used to split the peanut increased distally along the dental arch. However, the duration of the split phase was similar for the various teeth examined. During anesthesia of the periodontal ligament (four subjects), no significant changes were seen in the split phase. The forces used to hold the peanut between the teeth also increased distally along the dental arch: 0.60 N for the incisor, 0.77 N for the canine, 1.15 N for the 2nd premolar, and 1.74 N for the 1st molar. The difference in hold forces for the various teeth can be explained by the different sensitivity characteristics of the periodontal afferents innervating anterior and posterior teeth. During periodontal anesthesia, the magnitude and variability of the hold forces increased for all types of teeth, thus supporting the suggestion that periodontal afferent information is used in the regulation of the level of forces used to hold and manipulate morsels between the teeth.
20名受试者(12名女性和8名男性)分别使用右上中切牙、尖牙、第二前磨牙和第一磨牙进行握持和劈开任务。将半颗花生放置在配备传感器的平板上,要求受试者用两颗拮抗牙夹住放有花生的平板,且用力不要超过必要程度。约3秒后,要求受试者以自然方式劈开花生。每个阶段包含一系列三次试验,受试者对每颗牙齿进行五次握持和劈开任务。因此,每个受试者总共获得60次试验的数据。劈开花生时所用的力的大小和力率沿牙弓向远中方向增加。然而,不同受试牙齿的劈开阶段持续时间相似。在牙周韧带麻醉期间(4名受试者),劈开阶段未见明显变化。用于在牙齿间夹住花生的力也沿牙弓向远中方向增加:中切牙为0.60N,尖牙为0.77N,第二前磨牙为1.15N,第一磨牙为1.74N。不同牙齿间握持力的差异可通过支配前牙和后牙的牙周传入神经的不同敏感性特征来解释。在牙周麻醉期间,所有类型牙齿的握持力大小和变异性均增加,从而支持了牙周传入信息用于调节牙齿间夹住和操作食物颗粒所用力量水平这一观点。