Canpolat Fuat Emre, Yurdakök Murat, Korkmaz Ayse, Yigit Sule, Tekinalp Gülsevin
Neonatology Unit, Hacettepe University Ihsan Dogramaci Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Oct;9(5):659-63. doi: 10.1375/183242706778553372.
Twin pregnancies are becoming common as a result of increased assisted reproduction. Studies have shown that the smaller twin of a pair is at greater risk of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to determine if there is a relation between birth-weight discordancy and neonatal morbidity and mortality and to test the occurrence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in discordant twins. For 5 years all twins admitted to our intensive care unit were included in the study. Discordance was calculated as the difference between twins' weights divided by the heavier weight. Diagnosis of RDS was made by typical clinical and radiographic methods. Multiple logistic regression was performed with gender, weight order and birth order as the independent variables and RDS as the dependent variable. Two hundred and sixty-six twin pairs with a mean gestation of 33 weeks and a mean birth-weight of 1890 g were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression revealed that being the heavier twin was a more important risk factor for RDS (odds ratio 4.5; 95% confidence interval 2.2-9.2) than being the male or second-born twin. Based on neonatal outcomes a birth-weight discordance equal or greater than 20% in twin pairs was accepted as the discordance criterion. Discordant and concordant groups were statistically different in neonatal mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, polycytemia and hypoglycemia. Our data demonstrated that being the heavier twin is a risk factor for RDS and a birth-weight difference of 20% or more in twin pairs should be accepted as discordance.
由于辅助生殖技术的增加,双胎妊娠正变得越来越普遍。研究表明,双胎中较小的胎儿发病和死亡风险更高。我们的目的是确定出生体重差异与新生儿发病和死亡之间是否存在关联,并检测不一致双胎中呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的发生情况。在5年的时间里,所有入住我们重症监护病房的双胎都被纳入了研究。差异程度通过双胎体重之差除以较重的体重来计算。RDS的诊断采用典型的临床和影像学方法。以性别、体重顺序和出生顺序作为自变量,RDS作为因变量进行多因素逻辑回归分析。对266对平均孕周为33周、平均出生体重为1890克的双胎进行了评估。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与男性或第二个出生的双胎相比,较重的双胎是发生RDS更重要的危险因素(比值比4.5;95%置信区间2.2 - 9.2)。基于新生儿结局,双胎对中出生体重差异等于或大于20%被视为差异标准。不一致组和一致组在新生儿死亡率、坏死性小肠结肠炎、红细胞增多症和低血糖方面存在统计学差异。我们的数据表明,较重的双胎是发生RDS的危险因素,双胎对中出生体重差异20%或更多应被视为差异。